I could debate the word 'most' but that was not what I was hoping to have clarified. Prescott was made the permanent starter and everyone had their own opinions concerning Romo's health. So my question for clarification sought to find out whether you were referring to the point in time when Romo was declared healthy for his return as starter but was summarily denied the opportunity by Jones and Garrett. I apologize if I assumed incorrectly and do not seek clarification if that was not the case.
Remember the context of this line of discussion, which was the idea that the Cowboys fan base was "giddy" over Romo not being the starter. My thoughts regarding the point in time Romo was cleared to play again is that few people were "giddy" over Romo not getting the job back, and that there were a lot of fans that were upset he didn't, and that the majority of the ones that favored keeping Dak as the starter didn't feel that way out of some animosity toward Romo that would cause them to feel "giddy" about him not playing anymore, but rather because Romo's health had resulted in the team being unable to count on him for most of two seasons.
If you want me to flesh out what I'm saying a little more, most of those people who favored keeping Dak as the starter when Romo was cleared to play weren't calling for Romo's head while he was healthy, but because Romo was having persistent injury problems, and was getting older anyway, and we had a bright young star winning game after game, they felt the time had come for a change. In other words, it wasn't a matter of being giddy, it was a matter of following what they felt was a reasonable thought process.
