the discussion is, "could Romo take a hit better when he 26, or older" clearly taking a hit at 26 was easier than when his older body took a hit. no matter what you fill the body with , bodies are still subject to what their body can take at different factors, being older was a factor Romo couldt overcome, unlike a very few" Taking another hit had a bigger risk of ending his career painfully compared to him walking away on his own.
Aging does not occur equally among all people (or living things for that matter). Of course, physiologically all people, who do not have adverse physical deficiencies such as bone density deficits, are relatively the same.
Yes. I agree. Older people, this is
all older people, handle trauma differently as they age. Where I disagree is the assertion that people, in this case athletes, differ physiologically in the absence of physiological deficits. That is not logical.
Tell me. How does Tony Romo's
skeletal density differ from any athlete of equal age with similar health history? Please elaborate where the difference has been reported publicly if you have an explanation that backs your answer if possible.
EDIT: Added 'with similar health history' late