ABQCOWBOY
Regular Joe....
- Messages
- 58,929
- Reaction score
- 27,716
I think that's what I said.
Pretty much.
I think that's what I said.
A lot of pathetic teams built that false picture yet as good as those percentages say it was another average year at 8-8, lets praise and thank Dak for being sooooooo average.Yawn...…………..never gets old watching how the facts take everything the Dak trolls say and make it a comedy.
Dak was sacked 56 times last year and I recall the trolls claiming it was a QB stat. Dak was sacked 23 times this year, less than even his rookie year. Amazing how you don't hear about sacks being a QB stat anymore. LOL
I guess Dak all of a sudden got awesome again at avoiding sacks. LOL
Romo also won games when the team was behind by 10+ pointsRomo was definitely better when we were down 24-31 points.
Yeah he had a lot of come behind wins against teams with a losing record. Call up the Hall of Fame!Romo also won games when the team was behind by 10+ points
Only because you don't like what they tell you.Stats mean less than nothing.
No, I actually understand what I'm watching and can form valid observations without meaningless, trivial number gymnastics .Only because you don't like what they tell you.
You prefer to keep your blinders on
He's a troll that's why.
No, he didn't, and the identity of the guy who did shows the value of most stats.Not surprising, since Dak led the league in passing yards. Hopefully we get that deal done soon.
These graphs confirm what we all know: Dak is a solid all around QB. I think if you believe anything different, please explain. Because literally all the numbers are not in your favour.
Thing is, haters and fans can both be right. Dak is good but he's not great. He can make all the throws, he can score points, and he can lead the team. The jury is still out as to whether he can lead them to the Super Bowl, and after last year, we are all justified in wondering whether he has that extra bit of toughness to go all the way.
What is "sack avoidance?" Having a good OL?This is a horrible info graphic...in fact, nothing across it adds ups
He CAN make all the throws, just not ALL THE TIME! He is consistently late and his receivers are constantly making catches BEHIND themselves. This simple FACT is ignored in the stats, it's still a reception and a completed pass but there is no stat for Yardage Not Gained due to a Poor Pass. This is one of the reasons I distrust stats. Drops is another horrible stat. Who decides it's a dropped pass? Just because a receiver gets his hands on the ball does not mean it was a well thrown ball. If you favor the QB you will call it a dropped pass.
Be honest with yourselves, go back, re-watch the games, I mean really watch them, and just look at his passes. Yes, he has made some GREAT throws, but he has tossed some really crappy ones too. In my opinion, more crap that good. I personally have felt this way since he became the starter, even when the team had no one else to go to.
Who cares. Ya'll kill other Quarterbacks not named Dak for those same kind of interceptions. It's all fair game.I'd be curious to know how they calculated that. At least 5 of Dak's 11 INTs weren't his fault.
I have watched the games. All of them. He's no differe than any qb ever. Makes some throws and misses some.
From this Reddit thread:
https://www.reddit.com/r/nfl/comments/eo8u92/qb_statistical_profiles_for_2019_season/
There's a big difference between watching the game and screaming at the tv "Oh my gosh, if Dak only had good receivers and a good HC" while he is tossing manure all over the place. Try REALLY watching the game with an unbiased outlook. I have done it and I now believe the Cowboys can still win a championship with this turd at QB. They just need a top 5 Defense and a run game that nets 175 or more per game and TOP of at least 40 minutes.
Yet when you state that teams don't game plan for Dak, it's proof you have no understanding of what you are looking at. And that makes your observations invalid.No, I actually understand what I'm watching and can form valid observations without meaningless, trivial number gymnastics .
Yep....nerd crap. The type of crap that got McCarthy the job after a 12 hr interview.Oh look, more nerd crap.
We all watched the games this year.
They don't gameplan for him, other than making sure it's in his hands. Surefire win if they can stop thre run and score 24 points.Yet when you state that teams don't game plan for Dak, it's proof you have no understanding of what you are looking at. And that makes your observations invalid.
That’s exactly what Garrett said to stuff like this. Nerd crap and he found himself out the door because of it. Coaching without the information most other teams have because it’s “nerd crap”.Oh look, more nerd crap.
We all watched the games this year.