Twitter: Trey Wingo said it best about Dak and any upcoming draft QBs

America's Cowboy · Feb 17, 2020

Adreme said:
They took it to court and lost meaning the NFL was allowed to enforce its unofficial cap on an uncapped year which by extension means that year had a cap.

He knows that. He's simply a stubborn headed poster who loves to argue and also refuses to admit when he gets proven wrong.

CATCH17 · Feb 17, 2020

Adreme said:
They took it to court and lost meaning the NFL was allowed to enforce its unofficial cap on an uncapped year which by extension means that year had a cap.

You need to convince those who do salary cap data and not me because it was officially an uncapped year and is excluded in salary cap era data.

NotForLong · Feb 17, 2020

America's Cowboy said:
They are simply still butthurt because Dak dethroned their idol and forced him to watch Dak tear it up his rookie year while sitting on the bench and forced to retire afterwards.

Still stuck in 2016

PJTHEDOORS · Feb 17, 2020

StarBoyz83 said:
Give dak 33-34 no more
Either get it done or tag and trade him( should've traded him during the season if that's the case) or let him walk.

Trade him? Who starts, Cooper Rush? LOL!

America's Cowboy · Feb 17, 2020

NotForLong said:
Still stuck in 2016

Yeah, you Romosexuals. Hello? It's 2020 already. Time to accept Dak.

CATCH17 · Feb 17, 2020

America's Cowboy said:
Like I said before, Jerry got personally fined and the Cowboys got over $10 million in salary cap taken away in 2012 for Jerry spending over the $120 million in cap space the owners had agreed upon in private while the NFL and NFLPA negotiated a new contract.

Pretty crystal clear right there, but go ahead and keep being ignorant.

Seems they didn't know at the time and found out afterward. The NFL made up rules. That's why it was so controversial.

Like I said.. I pull data from sources that do not include it because the year was uncapped.

If you would like to include 2010 be my guest. Nobody else does.

America's Cowboy · Feb 17, 2020

CATCH17 said:
Seems they didn't know at the time and found out afterward. The NFL made up rules. That's why it was so controversial.

Like I said.. I pull data from sources that do not include it.

If you would like to include 2010 be my guest. Nobody else does.

No. I saw it in several online articles on the web. All you need to do is research it.

TheMarathonContinues · Feb 17, 2020

CATCH17 said:
Seems they didn't know at the time and found out afterward. The NFL made up rules. That's why it was so controversial.

Like I said.. I pull data from sources that do not include it because the year was uncapped.

If you would like to include 2010 be my guest. Nobody else does.

I don’t get the big deal though. He’s told you what it was. Why are you still relying on your “sources”?

PJTHEDOORS · Feb 17, 2020

Hadenough said:
At this point weve seen Dak for 4 years and I have no faith that he can put together enough wins in the playoffs to make this team relevant. He is just too inconsistent. If Jerry wants to just have a face to the franchise than Dak is good representative. But if Jerry wants to make the team a true threat to win a SB he needs to build upon the team itself and not over pay one guy and lose key players.

Too inconsistent? Was Romo too inconsistent? Dak isn't inconsisnt if Kellen Moore runs an offense that benefits his skillset.

Super_Kazuya · Feb 17, 2020

America's Cowboy said:
No. I saw it in several online articles on the web. All you need to do is research it.

Now there’s a statement rich in intellect... I saw it on the Internet... it must be true! No sources or anything. Classic trolling from the space cadet.

CATCH17 · Feb 17, 2020

Neither team was technically found guilty of violating the salary cap — because there was no cap. But the league determined that the Commanders and the Cowboys structured contracts in a way to gain an unfair competitive advantage in future seasons, when the cap was back in place.

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/13/...owboys-and-Commanders-of-salary-cap-room.html

Skillit · Feb 17, 2020

We are in a terrible position. I like Dak. I support Dak.

But playing such hard ball after an 8-8 season with so many weapons and a respectable D......in the worst division in football. Yes he had the stats but we all saw the misses / mistakes.

I love the leadership / intangibles......but there are literally 40 QBs who can steer this ship to 8-8 for half the money.

Kingofholland · Feb 17, 2020

Has anyone proposing we trade away multiple drafts read any scouting reports on Burrow?

Lacking arm strength and concerns about lack of production prior to this year. Isn't lack of arm strength one gripe people on this board complain about Dak? I get the argument that his contract will be less than Dak's but nobody factors in the cost of losing two additional 1st round players. What if we select an elite DT that would cost 17 million+ a year to replace? An elite safety cost 14+ million a year?

We really want to jettison a proven QB for an unkown, while sacrificing valuable draft picks to infuse more talent?

NotForLong · Feb 17, 2020

America's Cowboy said:
Yeah, you Romosexuals. Hello? It's 2020 already. Time to accept Dak.

Whats wrong with you?
You mentioned Romo and 2016. And now you are projecting it on me.

You have a serious mental blockage

America's Cowboy · Feb 17, 2020

NotForLong said:
Whats wrong with you?
You mentioned Romo and 2016. And now you are projecting it on me.

You have a serious mental blockage

Nah, just playing y'alls game.

America's Cowboy · Feb 17, 2020

CATCH17 said:
Neither team was technically found guilty of violating the salary cap — because there was no cap. But the league determined that the Commanders and the Cowboys structured contracts in a way to gain an unfair competitive advantage in future seasons, when the cap was back in place.

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/13/...owboys-and-Commanders-of-salary-cap-room.html

The New York Times? lol

pansophy · Feb 17, 2020

America's Cowboy said:
Yeah, you Romosexuals. Hello? It's 2020 already. Time to accept Dak.

Dak is more than good enough to win the Super Bowl. Only a select few would say Dak is worse than Garoppolo or Tannehill. The question that everyone is asking is how much can you afford to pay him knowing that every dollar going to Dak weakens the rest of the roster.

As committed as the Jones have been to Dak, obviously there is uncertainty about how much his value is or he would be signed. The transition tag would answer that question. Scary thought of starting over at QB and I'd like to see a deal for Dak that the team can continue to field some depth. I mean the whole way we build a team is flawed if you ask me, but if we had to part ways with Dak over money then at least we should have a solid running game to support the development of a new guy.

Super_Kazuya · Feb 17, 2020

pansophy said:
Dak is more than good enough to win the Super Bowl. Only a select few would say Dak is worse than Garoppolo or Tannehill. The question that everyone is asking is how much can you afford to pay him knowing that every dollar going to Dak weakens the rest of the roster.

Dak IS worse than Garoppolo and Tannehill. You must have been in hibernation during the entire season.

ABQCOWBOY · Feb 17, 2020

America's Cowboy said:
Just as good as it did for Romo. If it was good enough for Romo, it should be good enough for Dak considering Dak has been as good, statistically, or better his first 4 years starting as Romo was.

Are you willing to lose such a statistically good QB? If you weren't with Romo, you shouldn't be with Dak.

I seriously don't understand this line of thought. If it was good enough for Tony then it should be good enough for Dak........ It was a fail with Tony so how in the world does this statement equate? The team should continue with a failed policy indefinitely? I mean, is that what we are saying here?

Blake · Feb 17, 2020

NotForLong said:
Still stuck in 2016

Yes you are.

Twitter: Trey Wingo said it best about Dak and any upcoming draft QBs

Well-Known Member

1st Round Pick

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

1st Round Pick

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

1st Round Pick

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Regular Joe....

Well-Known Member