Barry Talks About Similarities/Differences To Emmitt

ghst187

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,559
Reaction score
11,377
I always wished Emmitt had the pure breakaway speed Barry did. If he did, Emmitt would’ve had way more TDs and yards then he did. He got caught from behind a lot.
 

BourbonBalz

Star4Ever
Messages
12,207
Reaction score
8,178
I liked watching Sanders and would watch them play just because of him. It wasn't the long TD runs is was those plays where he's water bug all over the backfield for 40 yards and gain 2. It was just the most unusual running style I had ever seen and many is the All Pro defender that he left grabbing air.

Sanders is right, Emmitt was far more patient and his OL loved him for helping them set up blocks. That was what he and Dorsett shared, they were two of the best ever in setting up blocks and it was a thing of beauty to watch. Just great vision.
Emmitt’s balance was also unmatched. It’s another great attribute for a back.
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
11,896
Reaction score
13,489
I appreciate both as great but different. I’m not sure why this board loves to disparage anyone who wasn’t a Cowboy. It’s comical
 

DFWJC

Well-Known Member
Messages
59,437
Reaction score
48,250
Just ask the guys who played the game. They'll tell you who was better.
This is a Cowboy fan site, so whenever this topic comes up, we get the home team slant

I love them both, but this isn't true....at all

As many or more player rankings have Barry ahead as they do Emmitt.

But it's spitting in the wind to even debate that point in this forum.

Both great back.....take your pick
 

EGTuna

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,201
Reaction score
1,559
Lomg story short: Sanders was a better tailback. Smith was a much better football player.
 

RonnieT24

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,570
Reaction score
21,653
Yeah, when he went into the NFL they were playing 12 games a season, and by his last year they played 14.

Yeah also when Jim Brown went into the NFL they were playing with 190 pound linebackers and 200 pound linemen. Jim was great but a lot of his competition was on par with modern day junior college ball. All things must be considered in context.
 

RonnieT24

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,570
Reaction score
21,653
Lomg story short: Sanders was a better tailback. Smith was a much better football player.

Partially true.. but blocking and catching the ball were part of the tailback job description. As well as getting tough yards when called upon.
 

Jarv

Loud pipes saves lives.
Messages
13,208
Reaction score
7,901
Emmitt was perfect for the Cowboys in the 90’s. His ability to get positive yards and put games away just ground down our opponents

if Barry had been here instead, we still win those Super Bowls and his career would probably have been longer and his profile would have been even more elevated than it is. He would have provided more trouble for opponents than Emmitt imo.

Hate to say it but give me Sanders
Barry would have gotten Troy killed, Emmitt was a dynamic blocker.
 

Big D

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,071
Reaction score
3,735
Barry would have gotten Troy killed, Emmitt was a dynamic blocker.
I believe that we likely would not have two of the three super bowls we currently have had we had Barry instead of 22.
 

Thomas82

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,418
Reaction score
3,239
Yeah also when Jim Brown went into the NFL they were playing with 190 pound linebackers and 200 pound linemen. Jim was great but a lot of his competition was on par with modern day junior college ball. All things must be considered in context.

No argument from me on that one.
 

mldardy

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,483
Reaction score
7,164
I always wished Emmitt had the pure breakaway speed Barry did. If he did, Emmitt would’ve had way more TDs and yards then he did. He got caught from behind a lot.
This is ridiculous. Emmitt has the all time record for TD's by a running back, you can't get any better than that. Emmitt didn't get caught behind a lot. So ridiculous what you are saying here and not true at all.
 

NickZepp

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,851
Reaction score
2,082
As Nate Newton would say, "I was just a fat guy until Emmitt Smith showed up."

Sander's OL in Detroit had a couple pro bowlers on it when he showed up (Lomas Brown & Kevin Glover).
Line play was generally pretty good for Barry it was QB play that was inconsistent. Scott Mitchell was really good a couple years. Erik Kramer was solid at times other than that the QB play or Detroit was poor. Also Herman Moore was one of the top receivers of the early to mid 90s. Maybe not at Irvin's level but that was partially because QB play was bad. But Moore had a 6 year span where he had 8300 yards and 57 TDs He was probably not at the Cris Carter/Rice/Irvin maybe even Sterling Sharpe level in the 90s but he's not that big a step down either.
 

ultron

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,925
Reaction score
8,992
Emmitt’s heart is bigger than Barry’s house, that’s the difference between the 2.
 

CyberB0b

Village Idiot
Messages
12,291
Reaction score
13,577
They’d be wrong. The people that think Sanders was better is simply because he was a “prettier” runner. He made more spectacular runs, but he was not better.
He was better on a garbage team.
 
Top