Whether it is practical or not, I can understand anyone's reasoning for not supporting Prescott. People have preferences. Case in point. Terrell Owens is a bonafide Hall of Fame wide receiver that was a genuine on-the-field asset for the team but was also a player I would never piss on if there was not a water hose to be found anywhere and he caught on fire.
In short, I get the dislike for Prescott. It is something that does not really bother me. What makes me shake my head is the sports talk show rhetoric echoed unceasingly by Prescott's critics. "
You cannot pay Dak for fill in the blank reasons."
Well, there is no 'you' as it applies to everyone except Jerry Jones.
Prescott has Jerry Jones' near or complete support.
It is extremely unlikely Jerry Jones will entertain gambling with a future high draft choice to replace Prescott.
Where is the discontent in understanding? I do not see it. Where are the posts proclaiming, "I know Prescott will get paid more than I know he should but he is not a qualified NFL franchise caliber quarterback." Likely, the answer is nowhere when I reflect back at the fact a significant number of Romo's critics never accepted the reality of his contract extension either.
Just a personal headscratcher for me.
/rant