For all the people who want to ditch Moore, help me understand. If you drop the Andy Dalton year, the last 3 years the Cowboys have been 4th,
1st and 6th in scoring. For those 3 years combined, the Cowboys are 2nd in scoring only behind KC.
The OC accomplished this with a QB that everyone but those completely in the tank for Dak agrees has fatal limitations, torpedoed
our post season this year with turnovers, and ended our post season last year with the stupidest in game decision I've seen since.....well ever.
Seems like the obvious problem is the QB not the OC, and if anything this OC has over achieved.
My 2 questions to the legion of Zoners who want to ditch Moore are:
1. Given Dak's liabilities, what exactly do you think a new OC will realistically accomplish that Moore hasn't already accomplished?
2. Given how profilic Moore's offenses have been compared to those of other OC's, do you realize it's likely that any offense under a new OC
will be worse not better?
So your first issue with your analysis is assuming Dak is a problem. As has been shown here is recent days, Jimmy Johnson AND Bill Parcells both think Dak is good enough to win a super Bowl.
Read that last sentence again, slowly, until you understand it.
Unless you, and your ignorant ilk, think you know more football than they do, let's just move on from that ignorance.
2nd- we have an offensive HC who won a super Bowl with his offense and calling plays. Snot nose has never been past the divisional round in LARGE part to his predictable and unimaginative playcalling. BP mentioned his playcalling as an issue.
You are not getting the value out of McCarthy that you should be. You are getting 35% of the benefit at best of what McCarthy can actually do.
Without Dak, and we have seen the offense without Dak in the last few years bc of injury, the offense is bottom 1/3. That is even with the great Cooper Rush running things that, again, your ilk, thinks is better than Dak.
So you wanted reasons, those are basic reasons. I can go into more depth if needed.