All four are on the original list, and the information included for them is the same as that for all 31 QB in the sample.
You broke out the
dependency on the short throws of Dak in comparison to some not great passers of the football from your original list.
When I showed that of that subsection of passers you broke out how Dak throws a much higher percentage of shorter throws you then brought into
that discussion Brady, Rodgers and Brees.
But failed to show their split efficiency numbers so that the comparison stayed relevant. Are Brees, Rodgers and Brady dependent on their short throws for efficiency? Probably not but you didn't break them down in this post like you did with Dak and the aforementioned poor passers. Why?
Were you trying to make Dak look good relative to Mitch and Cam and Smith and Winston? And when I used that data to prove a point you pivot to Rodgers, Brady & Brees without the necessary context?