2024-25 College Football Thread

gtb1943 said:
OK; but once again what seed where they ACTUALLY?

and both times I would argue that they were higher than 11 or 12. We can see it depends on how tough the conference is every year. Minnesota is a 5th seed in the NFC this year but what would they be overall? Probably fourth or fifth at worst.
Actually Detroit, KC and Maybe Buffalo are the only ones that should be ranked higher.
So once again you really do not prove anything.

NOW you put in CFP which they are all lumped together and tell me.
We have the 3-6 ranked teams left and seedings like the NFL and here are scewed by divisions and conferences

The Conference Champion Bye was dumb but it is what it is.
THAT was proven as all four of the Bye teams lost.

And in College Football the talent differential between first and eighty is much bigger than it is in the NFL.
Click to expand...
You’ve lost the argument on this one.

No amount of spin or goalpost moving will change anything.

Take the “L” and move on.
 
Robbieac said:
You’ve lost the argument on this one.

No amount of spin or goalpost moving will change anything.

Take the “L” and move on.
Click to expand...
only time people say this is when THEY have lost.

I already looked at the 2005 and 2010 NFL standings and also where those teams drafted in the next draft and your claims they were 11th or 12th are demonstrably wrong. They drafted at32 as SB champions but their records would have had them bottom ten easily.
 
gtb1943 said:
only time people say this is when THEY have lost.

I already looked at the 2005 and 2010 NFL standings and also where those teams drafted in the next draft and your claims they were 11th or 12th are demonstrably wrong. They drafted at32 as SB champions but their records would have had them bottom ten easily.
Click to expand...
Lol.

In 2010, there were 8 teams with BETTER regular season records than the Packers. Even in your fantasy world, the absolute BEST the Packers could have been ranked would have been 9th. Which completely smashes your argument that an 8th or lower team has never won a championship. And the Packers can arguably be ranked as low as 11th or 12th that year.

In 2005, there were 9 teams with the same or better records than Pittsburgh. The same argument can be made for their low ranking as well.

Take the loss and move on.
 
Robbieac said:
Lol.

In 2010, there were 8 teams with BETTER regular season records than the Packers. Even in your fantasy world, the absolute BEST the Packers could have been ranked would have been 9th. Which completely smashes your argument that an 8th or lower team has never won a championship. And the Packers can arguably be ranked as low as 11th or 12th that year.

In 2005, there were 9 teams with the same or better records than Pittsburgh. The same argument can be made for their low ranking as well.

Take the loss and move on.
Click to expand...
You claimed 11th or 12th so you were wrong; and SOS spits on your claims
 
gtb1943 said:
You claimed 11th or 12th so you were wrong; and SOS spits on your claims
Click to expand...
You defiantly claimed no 8th ranked team or lower ever won a championship. Stop trying to change the subject.

take-the-l-seth-meyers-here-you-go-jq1wlqdlj4zch185.gif
 
Last edited:
ND not having a QB that can throw consistently finally caught up to them.
 
Tomorrow's game is pretty much the championship. I don't care how great the ND/PSU defenses are, I don't see enough firepower on offense to beat Ohio State or Texas (who both also have good defenses themselves). Both of these QBs tonight look gross
 
Ooooff that’s some questionable PI call right there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 132 more.
Total: 6,822 (members: 232, guests: 6,590)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,113
Messages
13,789,512
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top