Is she taking the NDA to court for the right to take Jerry to court? lol im confused...but whatever. sorry
Based on what has been reported....
Right now Jerry does not owe her any money (beyond continuing to fund the trust if he still has to make those payments). The trust has been paying her predetermined amounts all her life, with 2 payments remaining: one at age 26 and one at age 28 (she is currently 25). While I am sure there were lawyers involved in establishing this trust, it is (reportedly) something that Jerry and the mother worked out on their own. It was not court ordered.
As such, she has no basis by which to sue Jerry. He doesn't owe her anything, nor is she entitled to anything beyond the agreement that was made 25 years ago. (If the trust had been a meager amount of money, she would be entitled to a degree of child support, but that does not appear to have been the case). For those trying to turn her into some sort of sob story.... she may not exactly have had the most ideal situation growing up, but she got dealt a hand which is a helluva lot better than most others born out of wedlock.
So how can she get more money out of Jones? Well, public pressure and threatening bad PR are always good strategies. As Jerry demonstrated 25 years ago, rich men pay money to avoid such things.... and he is a lot richer today than he was when he made the original deal. But first, she needs to weasel her way out of the NDA, which is the goal of this lawsuit.
Unintelligent people view the above as some sort of defense of Jerry, when all I am doing is explaining the law and extrapolating her motives.