SteveTheCowboy
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 20,605
- Reaction score
- 14,813
Wow THAT was fast!Still haven't addressed it.
Wow THAT was fast!Still haven't addressed it.
fuzzy didn't address THIS very fast!What is it you want me to address? I will....but be specific.
Still haven't addressed it.
You be like:
Still haven't addressed it.
You be like:
Marino and Aikman's playoff stats as similar or worse than Prescott.fuzzy didn't address THIS very fast!
Because i saw when you posted it and you were doing the same defletion so I just pointed it out again. Your repeated behavior reminded me of that dogs behavior so I added it.You responded HERE within seconds. YOu even edited it!
But not when I asked you exactly what you want.
What the freak dude. What's your malfunction?
Go seek psychiatric help! Seriously, you need help.You been busted. You and Americas cowboy same guy,.
Nope it was the 'Captain' in #176.Hey, Cleatus, I didn't bring up Dan Marino. @CowboyoWales did. I simply responded to him.
Nope, that's your agenda. You brought up Marino (which is a terrible comparison :based on stats and the legitimacy of comparing different era's) I thought the discussion is about 'clutch'. Dak's career figure of '55 when trailing >2 minutes remaining' on it's own, shows concern (especially when compared to his contempories).Yet, you chimed in and brought up Dan Marino, didn't you? All to discredit Dak, am I right?
So, as one can see, Dak Prescott has by far the better % amount of times he has thrown for a 90+ passer rating than Dan Marino. That proves more than just nothing as you stated. Thank you for bringing up Dan Marino. Following the playoff percentages, I would rather take my chances with Dak. So should you since you love to bring up stats, unless it doesn't fit your agenda.
You too??? Once again, I DIDN'T BRING UP DAN MARINO. YOU AND ANOTHER POSTER DID. I simply replied to your response to me when YOU BROUGHT UP DAN MARINO.Nope it was the 'Captain' in #176.
Nope, that's your agenda. You brought up Marino (which is a terrible comparison :based on stats and the legitimacy of comparing different era's) I thought the discussion is about 'clutch'. Dak's career figure of '55 when trailing >2 minutes remaining' on it's own, shows concern (especially when compared to his contempories).
Dak is a different QB with a lead when compared to having to step up and chase down an opponent. We did this to death on the thread which compared his figures to: Stafford, Cousins, Allen (the three QB's he always seems to be compared to).
(CAPS, not to shout, so that this point isnt ignored) THIS DOESNT MEAN THAT DAK IS A POOR QB, IT's THAT WE, AS A TEAM, NEED TO FOCUS ON 'ALL-OUT' GETTING A LEAD......EVEN IF IT MEANS TAKING CHANCES (BOTH SIDES OF THE BALL) EARLIER ON.
Dak over Marino is the most absurd statement posted in a long time here.During the playoffs? Absolutely.
What would make you believe Marino would be better during the playoffs?
During the playoffs? Absolutely.
What would make you believe Marino would be better during the playoffs?
STHU, troll! That's all you and your hating troll buddies got. You have to make it personal because you've got nothing when it comes to stats. Why do y'all even follow the team? Dak is not going anywhere. Go follow another team. You haters will not be missed. Guaranteed.Dak over Marino is the most absurd statement posted in a long time here.
Do you watch the NFL games or just hug your Dak doll?
Probably the latter........
Look at their playoff stats and passer rating percentages. Yeah, you better frigging believe it.UN friggin believable
Dan Marino...........HOF Dan Marino...............STHU, troll! That's all you and your hating troll buddies got. You have to make it personal because you've got nothing when it comes to stats. Why do y'all even follow the team? Dak is not going anywhere. Go follow another team. You haters will not be missed. Guaranteed.
Refute the playoff stats I posted between Dak and Marino. I dare you. Let's see how smart you truly are...Dan Marino...........HOF Dan Marino...............![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
...........thanks for the laughs.
The end for all you Dak slobbers is coming soon.Refute the playoff stats I posted between Dak and Marino. I dare you. Let's see how smart you truly are...
*tick tock...tick tock...tick tock*
wrong but good try saw troy have some terrible low stat games.. Maybe you need a key to offensive football;Dak Prescott 4th QTR stat line for that game was 1 of 7 for 27 yards and an Interception. The Aikman, Brady and Manning comparisons are apt. They probably wished they had that kind of 4th quarter stat line. Clutch.
I'm betting if you go through every single game in their career and you watched every single moment and remember them like you do the Dallas Cowboys the team you follow you're gonna find plenty of games all three of those have had that were very similar.. Now be goneDak Prescott 4th QTR stat line for that game was 1 of 7 for 27 yards and an Interception. The Aikman, Brady and Manning comparisons are apt. They probably wished they had that kind of 4th quarter stat line. Clutch.
Prescott has been the source of 14 game-winning drives during the regular season — defined by Pro Football Reference as an offensive scoring drive in the fourth quarter or overtime that puts the winning team ahead for the last time — in his three seasons as a pro. That’s more than Drew Brees or Matthew Stafford, who clock in with a tie for second place, have had in the same time frame.
That’s a testament to Prescott’s skill, though his numbers owe a huge debt to Ezekiel Elliott, the hard-charging tailback whose ability to open up opposing defenses is the foundation from which the quarterback builds. The former fourth-round pick has been the eraser who cleans up the stray marks created by an uneven cast of playmakers, and now he can prove himself as an upper-tier quarterback by stunning the Rams at the Coliseum in the Divisional Round.