911 calls released from Joseph Randle incident

[DallasEast]

Am I the only one who heard her say "we" broke the window in the first call?

Nope. I heard it as well.

 

[DallasEast]

the kid is shifty

I did a double take because I thought one letter wasn't the sixth letter of the alphabet.

 

[dupree89]

Randle is hanging out with a bad crowd. And that woman is probably one of the worst of the bad apples. Not saying Randle is a choir boy. Far from it. Best thing for Randle is that this is a huge wake-up call for him to get his head out of his rear end. .

I agree with you...but some of us said that after his other incident. I'll play along with the others here that think something is fishy and that the woman is to blame and Randle really didnt do anything to be charged for. I am not here to argue, so I will assume this is true.

But on the heels of the other case, he is putting himself in this position? He is hanging out with people that have pot and with people that want to 'set him up' ? Then it is very poor judgement on his part. He didnt learn the last time, I have no faith in him learning anything this time. Most of us saw the tape of him in the police station when he was arrested for the other thing, and how he carried on. This guy is dumb. He demonstrated no remorse when he was in custody. And now this.

There will be a 3rd "incident" within the next 12 months. That's the way it goes. Some can stay out of trouble forever and others can't stay out of trouble at all. And he's one of the latter. Talk about a 3 cent brain. That's Joseph Randle.

 

[RonSpringsdaman20]

I did a double take because I thought one letter wasn't the sixth letter of the alphabet.

HA!

 

[RonSpringsdaman20]

The kid is immature. The question is how will Dallas front office judge him. He's not getting paid a lot, so releasing him, or keeping him is not a big cost. I'm willing to see this play out, without judging... Although I haven't been happy with his conduct or the situations he's been in this season.

 

[speedkilz88]

I thought this one was funny:

A video posted on social media shows a woman who claims she's the other woman who was at the hotel with Randle. We asked if she would talk with us about her account of what happened that night, but she told us she would only do the interview if we paid her for it. It's KWCH policy not to pay for interviews so we declined.

http://www.kwch.com/news/local-news...ndle-cited-on-drug-charge-in-wichita/31089338

 

[DallasEast]

I thought this one was funny:

http://www.kwch.com/news/local-news...ndle-cited-on-drug-charge-in-wichita/31089338

I'm gonna lol if the other woman is Mandy.

 

[erod]

Charles Manson? Charles Manson?? I can see somewhat saying Aaron Hernadez but Charles Manson??? Good grief dude.

It was funnier that way.

 

[revospeed]

Are you serious? How did you miss this?

He went off on Dez when he was in custody and it got out publicly. Then, he got chippy and started talking noise at practice. Jason Witten walked up to him while they were in stretching formation, got in his face and grabbed him with both hands, and told him to "shut the **** up!" multiple times.

There were stories that the team was considering releasing him right there because, apparently, he's been a bit of a headcase since he got here, just like he was in college.

What did he do in college? I don't recall anything.

 

[Kevinicus]

I agree with you...but some of us said that after his other incident. I'll play along with the others here that think something is fishy and that the woman is to blame and Randle really didnt do anything to be charged for. I am not here to argue, so I will assume this is true.

But on the heels of the other case, he is putting himself in this position? He is hanging out with people that have pot and with people that want to 'set him up' ? Then it is very poor judgement on his part. He didnt learn the last time, I have no faith in him learning anything this time. Most of us saw the tape of him in the police station when he was arrested for the other thing, and how he carried on. This guy is dumb. He demonstrated no remorse when he was in custody. And now this.

There will be a 3rd "incident" within the next 12 months. That's the way it goes. Some can stay out of trouble forever and others can't stay out of trouble at all. And he's one of the latter. Talk about a 3 cent brain. That's Joseph Randle.

How exactly is he NOT supposed to associate with this woman? She's the mother of his kid, there is going to be interaction with her. Unless you want him to be a true low life and ignore his child too.

 

[adamknite]

Ok here's my opinion...since everyone has one.

I don't think Joe Randle is completely innocent. I think there was an altercation of some kind, but I think her arrival started it off. I know females like her and I have a pretty good idea of how it went down.

• Joe and his people are hanging out in a hotel room.
• Baby Moms and him are still messing around.
• She suspects other females are in the room.
• She lets her friend hype her up.
• She goes to the room with their child in order to show EVERYBODY who she is in his life.
• Proceeds to act the fool.
• He, in the most immature way possible, tries to get her out of the room. Probably did the Chris Rock, "shake the **** out of you" move.
• She calls the police. Specifically mentions gun to get them there. Notes he's a Dallas Cowboy as if that should matter.
• After he convinces her that she messed up by calling them, she tries to recant.
• Too late...and now he's caught a case.

My 2 nickels..

I was about to post my thoughts on this with an eerily close scenario in my head, but you said it much better than I could so I'll just agree and also mention how it sounded weird to me that she kept saying "Joseph Randle" It just came off as a "hey look at me" kind of call. Not saying JR is innocent as I clearly don't think he was, but the whole thing seems odd. Just really odd.

 

[xwalker]

That scenario is plausible in my opinion. The first 911 call does not sound like someone fearing for her immediate safety.

The beginning of the second 911 call sounds like it may have been made during or following second parking lot encounter between Ms. Jacobs and Randle. She may have told Randle the police were on their way and he would face the music. At that point, Randle may have explained some of the ramifications of contacting the police--which Ms. Jacobs may not have fully considered. Then the phone went dead for several minutes before the call was re-established with the 911 dispatcher and Ms. Jacobs claimed she no longer needed police assistance. A firearm was likely in play and Randle convinced someone to drive off with it in his car.

Of course, this is me reading a lot between the lines. Domestic violence is an extremely important issue that should not be tolerated. My question is whether my concept of domestic violence was met--namely, was Ms. Jacobs/family/friends targets of real or implied malicious intent by Randle? Or was this an angry disagreement between one confirmed idiot (Randle) and another possible idiot (Ms. Jacobs) where the police were dragged into?

The thing that people forget is that civil liberties like the right to due process is equally important to domestic violence.

Historically due process has been more important because the lack of due process is the government abusing the individuals rights; whereas, dv is peretrated by individuals. What was more egregious in WWII Germany, dv or abuse of individuals by the government? "Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it."

 

[FuzzyLumpkins]

What did he do in college? I don't recall anything.

Nothing.

 

[JoeKing]

How exactly is he NOT supposed to associate with this woman? She's the mother of his kid, there is going to be interaction with her. Unless you want him to be a true low life and ignore his child too.

By all accounts, he was already ignoring his child on his own accord. He didn't need a protection order to tell him to stay away, he was already doing that. If you want to call that being a "low-life" then so be it... I agree. The facts in the case is she came to him with the child in tow.

 

[WoodysGirl]

By all accounts, he was already ignoring his child on his own accord. He didn't need a protection order to tell him to stay away, he was already doing that. If you want to call that being a "low-life" then so be it... I agree. The facts in the case is she came to him with the child in tow.

All accounts, being hers, for the protection order? lol

 

[JoeKing]

All accounts, being hers, for the protection order? lol

According to court records he wasn't even served with child support papers until the past week. How do you not have those arrangements legally locked down unless you just don't care about supporting the child? The fact is he was ignoring his fiduciary obligation to that child. But to you that's funny?

 

[erod]

What did he do in college? I don't recall anything.

Nothing of this nature, but I've heard stories from local scouts, including Broaddus, that said OSU coaches grew rather tired of his act. Just general attitude and odd behavior, but nothing sinister. That's why he went in the 5th round instead of the 3rd or 4th, according to them.

If he was Marshawn Lynch, you tolerate it. But he's just an average NFL backup, so why mess with it?

 

[WoodysGirl]

According to court records he wasn't even served with child support papers until the past week. How do you not have those arrangements legally locked down unless you just don't care about supporting the child? The fact is he was ignoring his fiduciary obligation to that child. But to you that's funny?

Not having a legally binding court document doesn't mean he wasn't supporting his child, tho. I know several men with children who have never had a child support order, but there was nothing they wouldn't do for their children. It's just not a black/white issue to me.

What makes it funny is you're taking a side based on the recorded court documents of one party in the situation without really knowing JR's side, but suggesting "ALL" accounts have been noted in the court records. No you, have one account. lol

 

[JoeKing]

Not having a legally binding court document doesn't mean he wasn't supporting his child, tho. I know several men with children who have never had a child support order, but there was nothing they wouldn't do for their children. It's just not a black/white issue to me.

What makes it funny is you're taking a side based on the recorded court documents of one party in the situation without really knowing JR's side, but suggesting "ALL" accounts have been noted in the court records. No you, have one account. lol

I bet those "men you know" don't have an agent or have high dollar salaries that would be in jeopardy if a child support hearing were filed against them. It's just bad business to not have child support legally resolved. If JR hasn't been responsible enough by now to have child support court records filed in his favor, it's just another indication of the sort of knuckle head he really is. But please keep laughing because it's all fun and games to you.

 

[speedkilz88]

Not having a legally binding court document doesn't mean he wasn't supporting his child, tho. I know several men with children who have never had a child support order, but there was nothing they wouldn't do for their children. It's just not a black/white issue to me.

What makes it funny is you're taking a side based on the recorded court documents of one party in the situation without really knowing JR's side, but suggesting "ALL" accounts have been noted in the court records. No you, have one account. lol

I believe that there is also suppose to be an older daughter that he does support.