heavyg
Active Member
- Messages
- 1,817
- Reaction score
- 22
DaBoys4Life;2075371 said:Yea your right it was before DNA testing. However there are still innnocent people being sent to jail. Like we talked about earlier when you get a description of a suspect. Thats in blue jeans white T boots dreeds. It's llike picking a needle out of a haystack. Then we have celeberties that get treated differently or get a lighter sentence because they are celeberity or because they can afford the best legal defense. So if your poor and you can't obtain that top notch lawyer. Like what OJ had or the rapper cassidy who killed someone shot two other people and got a year in jail. Then rapped about later in his songs. Or RKelley and his relations with underage children however his trail is at what stage now? same can be said for Micheal Jackson. The difference is that is always the difference is the money and if you don't have the money and get arrested because you fit the description at the close or near the scence and get ID because eyewitness are very dependable. You get a public defender the case doesn't go to trail and you end up plea to a lesser charge.
The justice system can be good for some people and through your view it is good for you. However from my point of view is terrible and it needs to be changed. I would say that out of everyone in prison probally 95% are guilty. Then lets not even get into the people that are in prisoner for violent crimes and drug offense and such.
Oh I agree 100% that celebrities seem to have a different set of rules.
But I think your confusing going to jail with being held for questioning. As to our conversation about the description of a subject. If we were to find someone matching a description they are not snatched up and thrown into jail. He may be taken to the station where the victim will be asked to identify him. Or he could be taken to the scene and the same be done. So unless the person matching the description is identified by the victim he will not be in jail.