SLATEmosphere
Benched
- Messages
- 9,633
- Reaction score
- 2
Bob Sacamano;2844839 said:I got it now
hehe
but wouldn't it be 6 to 3? or 6 to 9?
If your going 6 to 3 I recommend you go to a Doctor.
Bob Sacamano;2844839 said:I got it now
hehe
but wouldn't it be 6 to 3? or 6 to 9?
AdamJT13;2844684 said:According to ProFootballFocus.com, our opponents used a nickel defense half of the time when we used that formation last season. We used it six times on first downs, and on five of those, our opponent stayed in their base defense. We used it four times on second or third down, and our opponent used a nickel defense all four times.
Hostile;2844819 said:No, just your crap.
what's bs about the formation?DaBoys4Life;2844880 said:This formation isn't BS? OOk that's what I thought.
Yakuza Rich;2844878 said:And that's what I suspected. If there's a mismatch, it's hopefully in the passing game on first down.
He's butt hurt.Rampage;2844905 said:what's bs about the formation?
only 12 more daysHostile;2844913 said:He's butt hurt.
DaBoys4Life;2844814 said:This thread was already garbage. So how can you command respect of your team if you do not seek disciplinary action upon a player for doing this no matter the circumstance seems pretty wishy washy to me.
SLATEmosphere;2844974 said:I campaigned for Daboys as worst poster...but noooo none of you would listen! The guy is a straight up moron.
SaltwaterServr;2844977 said:That's pretty insulting to the average moron. Daboys is in a short bus class all his own.
Rampage;2844905 said:what's bs about the formation?
Idgit;2844987 said:DaBoys is a moron, and on ignore. But thanks to you guys quoting him, I accidently read something he wrote. He's right: pantsing Dave Campo in front of HBO cameras was an embarrassing act of disrespect. Parcells endured something similar when Bryant threw his towel in his face, or I'd say that sort of stuff would never have happened previously. Still, though, that Pac was comfortable doing that in front of a camera was a disgrace. I'd have run that whole position group into the ground that afternoon.
FINALLY! I knew that you would eventually spit out the real reason behind your latest... whatever you want to call it... dislike. It's not the formation that bites for you. It's the suggestion of using Felix Jones.DaBoys4Life;2845001 said:Felix Jones is a bad blocker. The pro set is a bad formation. You really want to run sweeps in todays NFL? Um it's not the 1960's. Might as well bring up the near and far formation and we might as well run a base 4-6 defense. Let's not forget about the flex bone wing t and wish bone formation since we're running crappy formation that hasn't worked since the 40's.
DaBoys4Life;2845001 said:Felix Jones is a bad blocker. The pro set is a bad formation. You really want to run sweeps in todays NFL? Um it's not the 1960's. Might as well bring up the near and far formation and we might as well run a base 4-6 defense. Let's not forget about the flex bone wing t and wish bone formation since we're running crappy formation that hasn't worked since the 40's.
DaBoys4Life;2845001 said:Felix Jones is a bad blocker. The pro set is a bad formation. You really want to run sweeps in todays NFL? Um it's not the 1960's. Might as well bring up the near and far formation and we might as well run a base 4-6 defense. Let's not forget about the flex bone wing t and wish bone formation since we're running crappy formation that hasn't worked since the 40's.
This post screams Madden educated.DaBoys4Life;2845001 said:Felix Jones is a bad blocker. The pro set is a bad formation. You really want to run sweeps in todays NFL? Um it's not the 1960's. Might as well bring up the near and far formationand we might as well run a base 4-6 defense. Let's not forget about the flex bone wing t and wish bone formation since we're running crappy formation that hasn't worked since the 40's.
:laugh2: that was my 1st thought too.peplaw06;2845141 said:This post screams Madden educated.