A Little Formation To Get You Excited

CaptainAmerica

Active Member
Messages
5,030
Reaction score
26
Good stuff.

However, the question I have is can we block them and handle their pressure? That's one of the main things that has destroyed our offensive possibilities the past 2 years.
 

BehindEnemyLinez

Optimist Prime
Messages
2,253
Reaction score
10
starfrombirth;2843896 said:
The problem with this is that Felix and Bennett are not true wide recievers and though they can beat Safeties and linebackers, they are not going to beat true corners. This leaves nine in the box to stuff Marion and Choice. Sorry but I don't think this is a good plan.
Huh?

casmith07;2843951 said:
Please do not ever coach your kids or anyone else's kids in football. Ever. Thanks.
:lmao:

Hostile;2843920 said:
No one would ever stack 9 in the box against any team. That's suicide. All you have to do is send 3 people on pass routes and someone is wide open.
Exactamundo!
* damn you Hos for starting this thread! You're getting me fired up already! I cannot WAIT for the season to kickoff!!

ScipioCowboy;2843918 said:
So, if there are 2 corners covering Jones and Bennet and "nine players in the box", there's no one covering Jason Witten.

Touchdown!
Yet another hole in your "theory", starfrombirth! At best Witten would draw single coverage from a LB or S, which is gravy, IMO. OC doesn't seem to be your calling, my friend!! ;)
 

KingintheNorth

Chris in Arizona
Messages
18,441
Reaction score
25,822
casmith07;2843951 said:
Please do not ever coach your kids or anyone else's kids in football. Ever. Thanks.


That may be the funniest AND harshest post I have ever seen. I literally LOL'd here at work.
 

bbgun

Benched
Messages
27,869
Reaction score
6
Hostile;2843920 said:
No one would ever stack 9 in the box against any team. That's suicide. All you have to do is send 3 people on pass routes and someone is wide open.

The Gritz Blitz would. Sadly, they are no more.
 

dallasfaniac

Active Member
Messages
4,198
Reaction score
1
I am excited about offensive formations this offseason for multiple reasons.

First, several key players are returning healthy so we shouldn't see linemen still in their stance while the QB is getting thrown to the ground. Second, egos should be checked at the door allowing the focus to be spread around. Third, our new additions last year should be thoroughly acclimated to the offense. Fourth, the coaches now know what we have in our RB corps and would have to be complete idiots not to use them.

For these reasons, formations such as Hostile's should find alot of success.
 

DaBoys4Life

Benched
Messages
15,626
Reaction score
0
DaBoys4Life;2843606 said:
**** I wouldn't respect Garrett with those bull**** *** plays he was calling either. The back up QB is a big reason why we didn't make the play offs. He couldn't make all the throws there was no reason for him to be our back up. I know Owens is gone and it will hurt us. But forgive me for not sucking off some formation that your drooling over when Garrett is supposed to do more with less and we didn't even see an inkling of anything like this last season.

Out of curosity HoS why did you conveniently ignore this post?
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
that's awesome, Hos

we also need a wildcat option with Stephen McGee in as QB with Felix and Barber in the backfield

Witten, Bennett on the left side, and Austin as the wide on the other

McGee takes the snap

Felix and Barber split out wide-left, with Barber out in front

McGee pitches to Felix

danger...

you have Witten, Bennett, Barber and Kosier (who pulls) as blockers for Felix, who is in the open field with the football, able to use his speed and vision

you could also use this formation as a passing play, just have Bennett sneak across the middle of the field, and have McGee dump it to him from the left, so you have the motion and the defense going left, leaving the whole right side of the field open for Bennett to streak across of, reminiscent of that 50+ yard catch and run Bennett had in the workouts
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
Bob Sacamano;2844324 said:
that's awesome, Hos

we also need a wildcat option with Stephen McGee in as QB with Felix and Barber in the backfield

Witten, Bennett on the left side, and Austin as the wide on the other

McGee takes the snap

Felix and Barber split out wide-left, with Barber out in front

McGee pitches to Felix

danger...

you have Witten, Bennett, Barber and Kosier (who pulls) as blockers for Felix, who is in the open field with the football, able to use his speed and vision

you could also use this formation as a passing play, just have Bennett sneak across the middle of the field, and have McGee throw it to him from the left, so you have the motion and the defense going left, leaving the whole right side of the field open for Bennett to streak across of, reminiscent of that 50+ yard catch and run Bennett had in the workouts
screw that kid.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,299
Reaction score
63,981
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
DaBoys4Life;2844311 said:
Out of curosity HoS why did you conveniently ignore this post?
No matter how short or long, a reply may be epic. I may have to break out the ambulance. :popcorn:
 

Rampage

Benched
Messages
24,117
Reaction score
2
Bob Sacamano;2844342 said:
he provides a threat to run the football, so no
you don't take Romo off the field unless you're punting,kicking a fg, or kicking an extra point.
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
DallasEast;2844369 said:
THE ABS MAN HAS SPOKEN!!! But Rampage is right.

why is he right?

we want to run the WC, would you rather have a WR be the point man? or an actual QB who fits the WC profile?

this formation with McGee gives you 4 distinct options:

1. quick handoff to Barber

2. pitch to Felix

3. pass to Bennett with a bunch of field in front of him

4. McGee with a bunch of blockers can just run it himself
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,299
Reaction score
63,981
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Bob Sacamano;2844371 said:
why is he right?

we want to run the WC, would you rather have a WR be the point man? or an actual QB who fits the WC profile?

this formation with McGee gives you 4 distinct options:

1. quick handoff to Barber

2. pitch to Felix

3. pass to Bennett with a bunch of field in front of him

4. or McGee with a bunch of blockers can just run it himself
Taking Romo off the field cues the defensive coordinator to counter by having the defense key on the running backs and take his chances that McGee won't hurt the him by either passing or keeping the ball. He has to have his defense continuing to include Romo because he can burn you either way every time.
 

dallasfaniac

Active Member
Messages
4,198
Reaction score
1
Bob Sacamano;2844371 said:
why is he right?

we want to run the WC, would you rather have a WR be the point man? or an actual QB who fits the WC profile?

this formation with McGee gives you 4 distinct options:

1. quick handoff to Barber

2. pitch to Felix

3. pass to Bennett with a bunch of field in front of him

4. McGee with a bunch of blockers can just run it himself

McGee would have to be the 2nd string QB then, because if he were the 3rd string, once he enters the game Romo would not be able to return.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,299
Reaction score
63,981
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
dallasfaniac;2844380 said:
McGee would have to be the 2nd string QB then, because if he were the 3rd string, once he enters the game Romo would not be able to return.
Why would Romo not be able to return? It would only be a substitution.
 
Top