FuzzyLumpkins
The Boognish
- Messages
- 36,571
- Reaction score
- 27,856
Albert Breer isn't a medical doctor, so his diagnosis is irrelevant. He even qualifies his statement with this:
He says he has "foot activation", whatever that means, and the follows it up with a couple of paragraphs about why he is still wearing an AFO. Obviously, if he is wearing a device that "will allow you to have your foot flex up, but not have it slap down", then he does not have full range of motion, as "Dallas isn’t counting on anything like that in the short term."
I generally like your posts, and I don't really care if you are smarter than me. You very well may be. What annoys me about this subject is that you take a hard line stance, without adequate knowledge of the subject, knowledge you will never have, and you belittle anyone who doesn't agree with your assertions. As I said before, your opinion on the subject is just as valid as the guy at the liquor store. You've been proven wrong on this subject multiple times, but continue your passive aggressive attacks on people.
This has run its course. If you would like to continue the discussion via PM, that's fine.
Oh goodie I get the last word.
You won't even acknowledge the nerve firing. That is telling. And I really like the obtuseness about what it means that he can now activate his foot. For some people never admitting an error is more important than the truth apparently.
The next several paragraphs are not about why he would have to wear the brace. The next few paragraphs were talking about how he would perform if he wore the brace. Not remotely the same thing. Read it again.
And a device that prevents your foot from slapping down and allows you to flex it up implies a full range of motion. It doesn't slap down but it still goes down. And if it flexes up then it is what it is: up and down.
As for what Dallas "counts on" you should listen to what Jerry has to say about ambiguity and how comfortable he is with it. All the Jones have been very systematic about not guaranteeing any particular outcome regarding Jaylon. That really is neither here nor there in terms of his actual prognosis.
It is interesting how you bias out anything you don't want to hear from non-doctors and with the same brain take everything that supports your preferred outcome from them. Jerry and Breer are not doctors so we should ignore what they say about his foot and nerve directly but we should pay attention when they say they aren't counting on him and when you think they are saying why he should wear a brace. Convenient.
As for the last bit, you feign the humility but then insist that my opinion is no more valid than anyone elses. You cannot even keep consistency in your own paragraph. You are hardly the first person that has come at me as you do. You all do the same thing.
Further you don't seem to understand the difference between a factual statement and a statement of opinion.
When I say that a video shows Jaylon dropping his foot and picking it backup that is fact and not opinion.
When I say that a nerve regenerates at an average of 1mm a day and given the distance of the injury it should be done regenerating to the foot in 6 months that is fact not opinion.
When I say that a nerve injury left the outer nerve intact and it has an average outcome of a time period based on actuarial data that is not opinion.
When I say that he is wearing a Ritchie Dynamic AFO at training camp that is fact not opinion.
When I say that he was medically cleared to resume physical activity from his ACL and PCL injury that is not opinion.
When I say that he is playing with his nieces, fully dressed, and not wearing an AFO that is not opinion.
Now you can dispute the truth of any of those facts or whether or not they lead to a conclusion but whether or not I have a medical license is irrelevant to the truth of them. There is an objective truth and it is still the truth no matter how repugnant you think it is.
That is what you don't seem to understand. I present facts, welcome others to present other facts, and to argue what is true or not so we can all come to our own conclusions. What I am hostile to people that do as you do and bias out facts that are contrary to their preferred outcome on the basis of my credibility. That is all you ever do.