All time Cowboys QB Stats

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,135
Reaction score
16,178
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I didn’t indicate squat.
But this:

"Former Dallas Cowboys RB Ezekiel Elliott reportedly has been frustrated with the time it has taken to sign with an NFL team."


NOPE! The article you posted NEVER said "zeke said-------". Even listed under "NFL RUMORS ON TWITTER".

YOU..said "zeke recently said".....

zeke never said any such thing in the article you posted.

It's all right there for everyone to see.

Come on rocky...you know what you need to do. Be a man of honor if you dare.
 

SteveTheCowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,135
Reaction score
16,178
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Some would rather go through that than have Dak lead "THEIR " team

The Dreaded "Eye " test Strikes again
Why do you insult "the eye test"? Isn't that why we watch? Why not just read the box scores then?

You know why. You think YOUR ..."Dreaded "Eye" test" (lol) is so much more valuable then anyone else's eye.
 

eromeopolk

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,722
Reaction score
4,527
You just contradicted yourself.
Nope. The Dallas Cowboys win division titles every year, go to the Conference Championship games, and Super Bowls. Anything else would be considered losing. Stats come with the winning...Staubach retired the NFL all-time leading passer, Aikman retired as the Cowboys all time leading passer and threw +19 TDs once in his career, and Tony Dorsett left Dallas as the no.2 All time leading rusher behind Walter Payton.

The Arlington Jonesboys are all about stats and Jerry Dumbo GM Jones got his stats with his stat filling QBs (Romo and Prescott). For the Jonesboys, stats are everything. As Jerry said just "be relevant".

So I said what I meant and meant what I said...Losers on top of that stat list because QBs winning titles, going to conference championship games and Super Bowls are the qualifying standard for Cowboy QB stats.
 

USArmyVet

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,708
Reaction score
15,031
Not True.
The article said it was reported / suggested he was frustrated....all speculation from the writer....
Report the truth.
So then shouldn't Rock be benched for reporting fake news? That is a rule violation.
 

glimmerman

Well-Known Member
Messages
30,561
Reaction score
30,276
He is on track to have the same stats as leading Cowboy QBs in history. But hard to catch Aikman with those rings.
 

DZSierra

Well-Known Member
Messages
954
Reaction score
757
He is on track to have the same stats as leading Cowboy QBs in history. But hard to catch Aikman with those rings.
What's not listed in those stats is how many rings would Aikman have had if Jimmy Johnson wasn't the mastermind behind the team?

I'll still go with Roger being #1 and Aikman being #2. I'm too young to remember watching anyone play before Roger.
 

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,334
Reaction score
11,287
Just my opinion of watching the NFL from the 1970’s to the present:

Both Roger Staubach and Troy Aikman would put up Patrick Mahomes numbers if either quarterback was Kansas City’s starter last season and were 27 years old.

The specific offensive and era would change but what each player would be able to accomplish via knowledge and talent would not change.

Statistics are always relevant but ability and performance are the true determinations. Of course, the opportunity of seeing any player during live games is an observer’s advantage when speculating on what ifs.
There is alot that goes into this theory IMO, first Todays NFL player is much diferent than even the 90's players but if we assume (which i would also do) that they are Preparing as todays NFL player then yeah why would Troys arm not be just fine throwing it 30 times a game, i do laugh though as while there is a loud group here saying Dak is wildly inaccurate his comp% says otherwise while throwing more times a game than the QB's people tell me where pin point accurate....
 

DZSierra

Well-Known Member
Messages
954
Reaction score
757
Today's Cowboys lack the right culture to win SB rings.
With over a quarter of a century gone by, think we're past the term "Today's".

Luckily I'm old enough when I expected them to be there and they were.
 

DZSierra

Well-Known Member
Messages
954
Reaction score
757
And it also shows it takes a team to win Super Bowls and not just a individual like a qb alone.
And God forbid the coaching staff as well;)

I think everyone can agree that for the last 25 years, it's that "special mix" of players, talent and coaching staff that the Cowboys, for whatever reason is missing that one special ingredient to push them over the edge.

I would also like to thing that we could all agree that Romo's stats blows Nick Foles stats out of the water as far as being a better QB, but at the end of the day Foles along with that "mix" has a SB ring which I would like to believe is more important to a competitive NFL player.

Stats are nice in the NFL, but they really don't mean anything unless you can win the big one as a TEAM.

The Cowboys have been living under the shadow of Landry/Staubach and Johnson/Aikman (and all those other great teammates during those SB years) for WAY too long IMO.
 

CowboysFaninHouston

CowboysFaninDC
Messages
33,933
Reaction score
19,490
What's not listed in those stats is how many rings would Aikman have had if Jimmy Johnson wasn't the mastermind behind the team?

I'll still go with Roger being #1 and Aikman being #2. I'm too young to remember watching anyone play before Roger.
the fact that he has it. there is a million what-if-then-else scenarios one could play. would Jimmy have won without Aikman? facts say no. sometimes its the combination of right team, right player, right coach.

btw, Aikman won a superbowl without Jimmy
 

DZSierra

Well-Known Member
Messages
954
Reaction score
757
btw, Aikman won a superbowl without Jimmy
I knew that. However my opinion is (and it's just that, an opinion) is that Jimmy Johnson had a hand in that team to some extent on what he built after he left and what Aikman had to work with.

And you're right, there is a million what if's...
 

plasticman

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,481
Reaction score
17,564
By the end of Roger Staubach's career after the 1979 season, he was the 2nd highest rated passer in NFL history behind only Otto Graham. This is a minimum of 1000 passing attempts.

By the end of the 1982 season, Staubach was still the 4th highest rated passer at that point in NFL history. Danny White was the 3rd highest rated passer at that particular point in history. They were behind only Otto Graham and Joe Montana.

I think it's important to put these comparisons in proper perspective by understanding how the position has evolved since the host of new rules meant to protect quarterbacks and induce more scoring in the passing game.

Of the top 100 quarterbacks in passer rating, 60 started their careers after the year 2000, 15 started from 1990 to 1999, 15 started from 1980 to 1989, 3 in the 70's, 3 in the 60's and the rest before that.

Dak Prescott is currently tied with Kirk Cousins for #8 in highest passer rating in NFL history. Tony Romo is #11, sandwiched between Tom Brady and Steve Young.

Of the 114 quarterbacks with 100 or more pass attempts in the playoffs, Tony Romo is ranked #21, Dak Prescott #22, Troy Aikman #27.
 
Top