An idea for identifying credible posters

Future 585;1468403 said:
So, one can buy credibility? sounds about right..:laugh2:


My idea..darwinism, people call you dumb enough times, see ya later

Well, THAT's dumb...

:D
 
junk;1468424 said:
Sorry about that, but you'll probably just have to learn to live with me.

Would that be anything like learning to live with herpes??
 
nyc;1468457 said:
Well you my friend wouldn't get a high rating from me! :whip:

:D

Noo Yawkers have never liked me... can't begin to understand why...
 
Zaxor;1468438 said:
and we shouldn't be helping those people sitting on there fat :moon: collecting welfare...

I believe I have heard all of that before

First thing I do to see if someone is credible is check to see if there are any reptiles in the avatar.

:cool:
 
fortdick;1468328 said:
Anyway, I am starting to opine more than normal so I will quite. Anyone think this os a good idea or am I just TheProfit on this?

You trying to get me run off?

:cool:
 
putting a rating system on this board would never work.

If you do that I would imagine you will lose members, at least the ones worth talking to and reading.
 
A high post count doesn't make you credible.

Having a ZS tag doesn't make you credible.

Being cool with the staff members doesn't make you credible.

Shoot, being a staff member doesn't make you credible. Just ask Yeager. :)

It's about the quality of posts and it only takes a minute to read to see if the post was quality. Some of the Zone's more highly credible members don't have a high post count. But when they post, I definitely take the time to see what they have to say.

And if you think a member doesn't generate credible posts, then put them on ignore. Easiest way to filter them out of the equation.
 
Zaxor;1468423 said:
and thusly segregation

what if it read

Black

Asian

Arabic

Hispanic

White

or what if it read

over 60

over 50

0ver 40

over 30

0ver 20

or what if it read

bisexual

transvestite

gay

lesbian

heterosexual

..............................

any time you implement segregation BY ANY MEANS it is wrong

unity people...I realize that is a foreign concept to most and division is the order of the day but it is a dead end road.

G oodness,
O penness,
D iversity,
.....&
I ntelligence
S hould

W arn us
A gainst
T rolls
C oncealed as
H omers
I nvading our
N ews
G roup

think about it


Pretty good read........I like your imagination
 
Zaxor;1468423 said:
and thusly segregation

what if it read

Black

Asian

Arabic

Hispanic

White

or what if it read

over 60

over 50

0ver 40

over 30

0ver 20

or what if it read

bisexual

transvestite

gay

lesbian

heterosexual

..............................

any time you implement segregation BY ANY MEANS it is wrong

unity people...I realize that is a foreign concept to most and division is the order of the day but it is a dead end road.

G oodness,
O penness,
D iversity,
.....&
I ntelligence
S hould

W arn us
A gainst
T rolls
C oncealed as
H omers
I nvading our
N ews
G roup

think about it

http://i28.***BLOCKED***/albums/c213/tx0min/hippie.jpg
 
WoodysGirl;1468522 said:
And if you think a member doesn't generate credible posts, then put them on ignore. Easiest way to filter them out of the equation.

wol_error.gif
We can't help you ignore yourself.

Add New User to List

jackrussell


Can't seem to get it to work....
 
Hostile;1468333 said:
The software system we use has a user reputation system and we have weighed the pros and cons of using it or not.

Seems a little inappropriate though because I could see a case where just because one poster takes a position many might disagree with, he would somehow get a low reputation.
 
DallasEast;1468402 said:
:star::star::star::star: Great poster


:star::star::star: Good poster


:star::star: Average poster


:star: Fair poster

the_jerk.jpg
Troll


Who gets to decide though, that is the problem. Personally I think I fit into the good category whereas I am sure some consider me in the Steve Martin category.
 
jackrussell;1468663 said:
wol_error.gif
We can't help you ignore yourself.

Add New User to List

jackrussell


Can't seem to get it to work....
:bow: :laugh2:
 
CanadianCowboysFan;1468678 said:
Who gets to decide though, that is the problem. Personally I think I fit into the good category whereas I am sure some consider me in the Steve Martin category.

who cares? the poster who thinks you're in the Steve Martin category is probably a dolt in his own right
 
CanadianCowboysFan;1468678 said:
Who gets to decide though, that is the problem. Personally I think I fit into the good category whereas I am sure some consider me in the Steve Martin category.


I've never seen any posts of yours where anyone considered you a "troll"?

Are you self-conscience?

;)
 
Back
Top