BlindFaith;3082217 said:I agree. I've said this before. Use Barber as a pass receiving/running fullback alah Tony Richardson and Richie Anderson.
Put him and Choice in the backfield together. Let Barber block some. He's powerful enough and loves contact.
This would give us two added dimensions. One, we would have a fullback that could do more than just block and two, it gets a more explosive play maker in at tailback.
I know this isn't Madden and you cant just go moving players around, but I think Barber could excel in this type of role.
RS12;3082093 said:Seeing as how the O Line decided not to show up yesterday, you could have put Jim Brown out there in his prime and they would not have been able to run it.
SkinsandTerps;3082064 said:Isn't Choice a poor blocker ?
That is probably part of the issue.
RS12;3082093 said:Seeing as how the O Line decided not to show up yesterday, you could have put Jim Brown out there in his prime and they would not have been able to run it.
JohnsKey19;3082243 said:I dont buy that. Not when you run only 11 times in what essentially was a 3 point game for 3+ quarters. You cant establish a running game without sticking to it. We've seen it against us for years. We'll stop the run for 2-2.5 quarters, then all of a sudden, holes begin to break open.
iceberg;3082259 said:did you WATCH our OL?
just because we wanna run it doesn't mean we'll be able to "at will". GB did a great job stopping us, and our OL fell apart at the seems, esp after columbo went out.
if you don't think crappy play from the OL has a huge impact on the overall game, then not much sense in really going on from here.
iceberg;3082259 said:did you WATCH our OL?
just because we wanna run it doesn't mean we'll be able to "at will". GB did a great job stopping us, and our OL fell apart at the seems, esp after columbo went out.
if you don't think crappy play from the OL has a huge impact on the overall game, then not much sense in really going on from here.
DaBoys4Life;3082277 said:I think you're missing his point. If you're not even going to attempt to keep the D honest your hurting yourself. Lets not act as if the passing game was doing wonders. Garrett bailed on the run game because we were down. He always does that.
BlindFaith;3082283 said:Hard to call 4.4 yards per rush being called stopped. The only thing that was stopped was calling running plays. We only ran the ball 14 times in the game. We had been averaging 26 rushes per game.
GreenBay had been holding teams to a 3.5 average per carry. We were running on them, we just stopped.
Then GB teed off on us with blitzes and pressure that we didn't read or execute against.
iceberg;3082291 said:well let's not act like running the ball was giving us huge success and we stopped doing it cause garrett is an idiot - deal?
he bailed on the run cause we kept getting sacked and 2nd / 15 isn't a running down now is it?
BlindFaith;3082283 said:Hard to call 4.4 yards per rush being called stopped. The only thing that was stopped was calling running plays. We only ran the ball 14 times in the game. We had been averaging 26 rushes per game.
GreenBay had been holding teams to a 3.5 average per carry. We were running on them, we just stopped.
Then GB teed off on us with blitzes and pressure that we didn't read or execute against.
The Realist;3082234 said:I disagree with playing MBIII at FB.
Choice 15 + carries
DaBoys4Life;3082296 said:Okay if Romo was getting sacked and pressured so much wouldn't it make more sense to run the ball? I guess 1st and 10 isn't a running down.
BlindFaith;3082283 said:Hard to call 4.4 yards per rush being called stopped. The only thing that was stopped was calling running plays. We only ran the ball 14 times in the game. We had been averaging 26 rushes per game.
GreenBay had been holding teams to a 3.5 average per carry. We were running on them, we just stopped.
Then GB teed off on us with blitzes and pressure that we didn't read or execute against.
iceberg;3082303 said:yea, running on 2nd and 17 is a great call.
iceberg;3082297 said:Originally Posted by ethiostar
.......(stuff removed)
First Half
* Series one -- two rushes, 20 yards;
* Series two -- three rushes, 8 yards;
* Series three -- one 1st down rush for 2 yards. Romo sacked on 2nd, taking the run option away on 3rd;
* Series four -- two rushes for 3 yards. Choice is two feet short on a 3rd-and-4 draw;
* Series five -- no rushes; Roy Williams fumbles on drive's only play;
* Series six -- Romo is sacked on 1st down, putting Dallas in 2nd and long. No rushes;
Second Half
* Series one - Barber rushes on 1st for no gain. Romo sacked on 2nd down;
* Series two -- Choice runs once for 11 yards; Williams and Witten bungle the drive on subsequent plays. (see above);
* Series three -- Felix Jones rushes on 1st down for 4 yards. Romo sacked on next play and fumbles;
* Series four -- Dallas takes the field here down 17-0 with 10:44 left and doesn't call another run.
put the hate down and simply tell me - does it sound like we missed on a lot of running opportunties in here when you break it out play by play? most of the complaints i hear about us not running don't seem to take into account the way the game unfolded.
DaBoys4Life;3082277 said:I think you're missing his point. If you're not even going to attempt to keep the D honest your hurting yourself. Lets not act as if the passing game was doing wonders. Garrett bailed on the run game because we were down. He always does that.