Still loling ?
Do you realy think that with this kind of language anyone will take your argumentation serious ?
As opposed to someone who ignores a record pace statistical season by Dak with a top ten int %?
listen, if you’re intimidated, DON’T engage me.
When I want an opinion from someone who subjectively and overtly ignores relevant statistical data because of an agenda driven by being pissed at Dak Prescott failing to be the miserable bum all of you “subjective geniuses” say he is, then I’ll look to you but you’ll be second in line behind Khalidi.
Lmao dynamic...
yeah, we were an offensive mired in mediocrity with Dak but feel free to change the definition of “dynamic” to whatever suits your fancy so that you can create the conclusion you’re looking for. That’s called an ad hoc fallacy btw. You’re welcome lol (does this really bother you because I’ll stop if you want me to. Really I will lol)
Now are you gonna keep on crying with snowflake complaints about lollers or actually put some meat on your posts? You’re boring me otherwise.
LOL!!
We are about to find out how smart you are!!