Bob Sacamano
Benched
- Messages
- 57,084
- Reaction score
- 3
theogt;3434250 said:Holy cripes, soccer sucks.
http://img715.*************/img715/2391/70b20993f64177a4.jpg
theogt;3434250 said:Holy cripes, soccer sucks.
That's me being forced to watch soccer.Bob Sacamano;3434254 said:http://img715.*************/img715/2391/70b20993f64177a4.jpg
I suppose you could scale hatred.tecolote;3434205 said:Here's what I don't get, with so many things to hate in this world (Hitler and such), why do some people spend so much time and energy hating a sport.
Hostile;3434334 said:I suppose you could scale hatred.
I hate Hitler more than I hate soccer.
I hate soccer more than getting kicked in the pills.
I hate pedophiles more than soccer.
I hate soccer more than text messaging.
Just because I hate some things more, doesn't mean I can't enjoy my soccer hate and share it with my fellow haters. I decided not to spoil the other pro-soccer thread. But this one is pure ambrosia for a soccer hater.
But that isn't what this thread is. Look at the title. It is a hate soccer thread. So we want people who hate soccer, like me, to chime in.tecolote;3434344 said:I get that Hos. I hate getting kicked in the pills as well, but I would not go posting that getting kicked in the pills sucks in every thread started by people that like getting kicked in the pills.
Naw, not really. I hated to even see it. Made me kind of nauseous.And I appreciate you holding off in posting in the World Cup thread, you must have been chomping at the bit to do that.
The 4th verse of the Star Spangled Banner gives me more goosebumps than the 1st verse, but the last 3 verses are seldom sung. Here are the lyrics...Another thing, I know you hate soccer but here it goes. The US plays on friday at 9AM central, just turn your TV at about 20 to 9 and listen to the Star-Spangled Banner with the players on the field, I promise you will get goosebumps.
I would. Hearing that song would not change my tune about the game.If you want to turn off the TV after that it's your call.
Rynie;3434379 said:I hate soccer too, but I was in London in '02 when England played Brazil in the World Cup. As much as I hate soccer, I do appreciate how SERIOUS the fans are about their team.
The game was televised at 7:00 in the morning (London time). We were told by a local to go to Trafalgar Square. My buddy and I wake up at 7, buy a six-pack of Heineken, and hop on "the tube" toward the square.
We get there around 7:20ish. There are literally THOUSANDS of people crowding the square, even hanging on the statues. They played the game on a huge screen for the fans.
It's 7:00 AM and people are PISSED DRUNK. These people are CRAZY. I had more fun walking around. I could care less about the game. England looks like they're in trouble. I told by friend "let's get out of here."
Good thing we left early. We watched the news that night and there were riots in Trafalgar square because they ended up losing. It was a good experience.
SaltwaterServr;3434377 said:Most popular = appealing to the lowest common idiotic denominator for the entire globe.
Two kids with a coconut husk and a line in the sand can play soccer. It's the least advanced sport in the world as far as requiring any kind of "technology". Even in baseball you need a stick to hit the coconut husk with.
The popularity springs from the simplicity and doesn't make it a "great" sport, only a sport that any two half starved third world morons can play at any given time.
More people saw Titanic than any other movie. That make it the best movie in history? No, it appealed to the lowest common denominator.
I read somewhere that Beringer White Zinfandel is one of the biggest selling wines in the world. Does that popularity change the fact that it's absolute garbage in a bottle as opposed to absolute garbage of a sport? Nope, appeals to the lowest common denominator.
I have to agree with everything BBGun posted. Our 5th best compete with the "best in the world." What a joke.
It the NFL wildcard round ended with a bunch of 7-3 or 6-3 scores, we'd say that those games really sucked and not that it was heavy duty defensive play. Even the best defenses in the NFL get scored on.
In the World Cup, the best offenses in the entire world are scoring twice. Twice. Score, Score, now sit around for 90 minutes and hope someone gets in a fight in the stands.
One of the reasons the World Cup is so popular is that it allows wholly insignificant nations such as Slovakia to actually be recognized for a few seconds. What would Slovakia rank as far as GDP of the individual States and territories of the United States? Dead last?
How about Argentina? Do they even make the news when they aren't invading the Faulklands?
Half-***** near backward countries get to compete at the only thing they'll be good at. History has passed them by. They are immaterial and irrelevant to international commerce, culture, or politics. Once every four years they can score a goal and be, for a moment, on par with the greatest nation in the world and we as Americans don't even care enough to notice. They're just fleas hanging on our **** before they fade back into obscurity.
For another matter, the soccer "athletes" aren't that great of athletes to begin with. They can run and kick. That doesn't require the dexterity of a jump shot, slap shot, saving a goal in hockey, or eluding a 245 pound linebacker before you put a football through a window with a 1/2 inch to spare between the WR and the CB.
Even their "pitch" can't hold up to our football. We tore up their field in one half of football when the Giants played in England. One single half. Destroyed the field. Soccer "athletes" are playing game after game on that field in South Africa with no real wear and tear on it, I assume. Put two of the worst NFL teams out there and it would look like it was ready for planting come the next day.
Soccer, give me a break and get back in the closet for the next four years. Nike and ESPN can cram it down our throats we care, but in watching the games on TV, the game flat out sucks in every regard.
Cythim;3434412 said:Why are the Cowboys the most popular team in the most popular sport in America? Oh, it must be because they appeal to the lowest common denominator.
CanadianCowboysFan;3434065 said:well you were a colony, why don't you play soccer too?
SaltwaterServr;3434377 said:Most popular = appealing to the lowest common idiotic denominator for the entire globe.
Two kids with a coconut husk and a line in the sand can play soccer. It's the least advanced sport in the world as far as requiring any kind of "technology". Even in baseball you need a stick to hit the coconut husk with.
bbgun;3434362 said:Stolen from a political site that I frequent:
I have a liberal friend who’s rabid about soccer. He even writes as a blog/journalist on some soccer web sites. So I gave him my rundown on why I don’t like soccer and it has nothing to do with politics or low scores. And I think the majority of Americans probably would agree with it.
Single-dimensional game. Most American sports require multi-dimensional skill sets…throwing, running, kicking, hitting, tackling, catching, dribbling, shooting, etc…Soccer is single-dimensional. Running and kicking. That’s it.
Luck or skill?
When only 1 out of 20 passes in front of the goal results in a legitimate shot on goal attempt, (score or no score), it starts to look more like luck than skill. With such a low percentage it gives the appearance (rightly or wrongly) that they just kick it around until somebody lucks into a shot. The “successful assist” percentage needs to be much higher. Imagine if only 1 in 20 basketball passes resulted in a shot. Hockey actually suffers from the same problem, but even their “assists” percentage is higher than soccer.
Kicking it away from the other team
. Any sport where you deliberately just kick it down to the opposite end as far as you can just to get it away from your end is suspect. Once again, Hockey pleads guilty to this as well. At least in football punts are caught and run back and can potentially result in one of the most exciting plays of the game.
Athleticism
… in the USA the best athletes play 1) football 2) basketball 3) baseball 4) hockey 5) the rest (including soccer). Any sport where our 5th best athletes can match up on the world level with the best athletes from the other countries doesn’t say much for the athleticism and skill level of the game as a whole. Our 5th best athletes should rightly be getting their butts kicked. If they’re not, then the other guys aren’t that good either. Which takes you back to…luck or skill (see #2).
Celebrating a tie
….any sport where you celebrate a tie…especially when somebody else booted the ball to allow you to score…is suspect.
I really think soccer athletes just don’t match up to football/basketball/baseball athletes. Yes, they run longer distances…but so do marathon runners. They’re not faster, stronger, quicker, higher jumpers, etc…they just have more stamina. Other than that they’re not very impressive as far as “athletes” go…not compared to traditional-American-sport athletes. And that is why Americans don’t care for soccer. We’re just not that impressed.
tecolote;3434465 said:It breaks my heart to think of the millions of kids in the streets of London, Paris and Madrid looking in vain for coconuts to play soccer with.
Your drivel was arrogant and uninformed at best, moronic and biased at worst, you should stop playing with your coconuts and get a clue.
This is why I sing songs about how great you are. You just get it.tecolote;3434369 said:You know what, who am I to step between a man and his hatred of soccer. Hate away Hos, have fun in this thread.
Hostile;3434491 said:This is why I sing songs about how great you are. You just get it.
Thanks. In your honor I will post my all time favorite soccer video. The only soccer video I actually enjoy.
[youtube]3lZDSud6HIs&[/youtube]
Okay, so I like this one too.
[youtube]IjynbUNlvWU[/youtube]