Any position you oppose in 2nd?

[Verdict]

Is there any position that you would oppose us addressing in the second round?

 

[Future]

QB, RB, OL, CB, LB

 

[Doomsday77]

RB, QB, WR and honestly don't think we need to address TE either. 4 is enough. I'm good with K, P and long snapper as well. I believe other OP's have covered positions of need once or twice.

 

[Bobhaze]

No. It’s always smart to draft great football players when available.

 

[Irvin88_4life]

Since we already have a franchise QB I would say we can skip that position....... Haha haters come at me

 

[Crown Royal]

RB is the only position I wouldn't address, because I don't think anyone in the second is going to be better than Zeke and it's too high for a depth pick.

Otherwise, we aren't dominant enough at any other position for them not to consider the right player if available.

 

[tyke1doe]

Kicker.

 

[ChuckA1]

I wouldn't shy away from a good O Guard if one is there. Our OL collapsed against the Rams and Colts this year.

 

[CATCH17]

linebacker. That's about it and I think we're good on defensive end too.

 

[DFWJC]

Since we already have a franchise QB I would say we can skip that position....... Haha haters come at me

 

[xwalker]

Is there any position that you would oppose us addressing in the second round?

Not really, other than the obvious of no kickers or Fullbacks...

Anytime a team get a very good or great player, it does not really matter what position that player plays when looked back.

The Cowboys do their best in the draft when they take players that they are "comfortable" with long before draft day.

It was common knowledge that most or everyone with the Cowboys was comfortable with Frederick, Martin, Tyron, Vander Esch, Zeke, Dak etc. long before draft day.

On the flip side, many of their busts or just OK players were last minute decisions because the players they really wanted got taken a few spots ahead.

The all time example was in the 2009 draft where the only player they liked in the 2nd round was the Center Max Unger and Seattle traded up to take him a few spots ahead of the Cowboys pick. At that point they traded down and then threw a dart at the draft board where they had several players with similar grades and had not really vetted many of them in great detail.

 

[DFWJC]

Kicker.

we have a winner

 

[Creeper]

If a real talent drops into the 2nd round, I don't care what position he plays. An upgrade is an upgrade. Drafting a position is a fools errand. Late second round is a place where you can draft anyone, except punters and kickers. If a quality QB prospect dropped into round 2 I would take him if I thought he was the real deal. Who knows, maybe we trade him or Dak for a 1st round pick later on, like the Steve Walsh deal.

 

[John813]

Safety or DT.

Why spend a high pick on one when you can grab a project after the draft?

 

[CouchCoach]

The only positions would be RB or WR, even if they let Beasley walk. I am assuming they're extending Prescott so no QB in the 2nd.

I'd like to see a DT but I think this is going to be a blast from the past, TE.

 

[HungryLion]

QB, RB, OL, CB, LB

This list is spot on.

 

[Doomsday77]

No. It’s always smart to draft great football players when available.

It is smart but not when you have the best RB in the league. BPA does not apply in a draft when you don't have a #1

 

[ClappingCarrot]

Yeah - the biggest needs this team has (S, DL, and TE) MUST be addressed in the second round.

I don't want to see anything else.

 

[kskboys]

No. It’s always smart to draft great football players when available.

They'd have to be rated a lot higher, because if we keep refusing to address S and DT adequately, we're just spinning our wheels.

 

[ABQCOWBOY]

Kicker or Punter.