Anyone else furious with the officials?

I believe that Reid told his players to go after Romo, late or what have you? What did it matter at that point? fine? = no big deal?

Another Philly bounty?
 
CowboyMike;3195937 said:
Wow, are you serious?

http://i226.***BLOCKED***/albums/dd74/nardovictor/chrisfamily1wmc4.gif
Are you surprised? This dude has been a joke from the first time a read his posts.
 
dbair1967;3195298 said:
Such as?

One of my best friends is an Eagle fan, even he admitted they got away with alot of stuff today. And he never admits crap.

:rolleyes:

over the entire course of a season, children.
 
Ntegrase96;3196339 said:
And on the PR, the hit was a tad unnecessary, but Crayton was trying to get as many yards as possible while lazily trying to get out of bounds... whoever it was that hit him committed his momentum before Crayton's foot was out, IIRC. Could've gone either way.

No, this couldn't have gone either way. Crayton was standing in the field of play. I would expect nothing less from a special teams player than to knock the crap out of the returner. Totally legal.
 
AbeBeta;3196883 said:
No, this couldn't have gone either way. Crayton was standing in the field of play. I would expect nothing less from a special teams player than to knock the crap out of the returner. Totally legal.


No your wrong. His foot was on the line and he was heading out. We would have been flaged no doubt. Boderline but still 15yds.
 
Eddie;3194321 said:
The Refs were trying to keep the Iggles in the game. Several lame calls which called back long gains.

Next week, the Iggles won't have the refs to save their hides.

BTW, we need a new kicker. This is pathetic.

why do we need a new kicker? that FG was in, but the refs called it no good. if you look at it again, the ball NEVER went outside the goal post.
 
LOBO7;3197440 said:
No your wrong. His foot was on the line and he was heading out. We would have been flaged no doubt. Boderline but still 15yds.

He was heading out? So what. He wasn't out. He's not out of bounds. He's on the field. It isn't even borderline. You don't want to get hit, get out of bounds.
 
brickman;3196642 said:
Exactly the way I saw it. I'm surprised one of our linemen didn't go after him.

the only one that would have was injured (Colombo)

the rest are ******* in that regard

of course Flozell will go after an entire NY Giants bench in order to save face after making a dirty play...
 
AbeBeta;3197576 said:
He was heading out? So what. He wasn't out. He's not out of bounds. He's on the field. It isn't even borderline. You don't want to get hit, get out of bounds.
His foot was on the line. That is "out of bounds" by definition. I wasn't too upset about that because it was a bang/bang sort of thing and easy for the refs to miss. But he was out of bounds. If it had been a catch at that spot it would have been called incomplete.
 
LeonDixson;3197609 said:
His foot was on the line. That is "out of bounds" by definition. I wasn't too upset about that because it was a bang/bang sort of thing and easy for the refs to miss. But he was out of bounds. If it had been a catch at that spot it would have been called incomplete.
Exactly. It should not have been a call. The NFL is starting to get soft just like a flacid you know what, so if they would have called that they would have just been reinforcing that image. Crayton got blasted, but I'm glad they didn't call it.
 
Zaxor;3194640 said:
Awful officiating today I haven't seen such garbage since...the KC game

I see what you did there.

But yeah, that hit on Tony was completely inexcusable. That was a penalty even under the old rules before the QBs started getting babied.
 
This whole situation the NFL has created is completely idiotic when you consider that a good part of the problem could be solved by having an official sitting on the sidelines with a flag in his pocket while watching the game on TV.

That is all it would take to flag many of these plays the herd of refs on the field can't see or choose to ignore.
 
Back
Top