I suppose a better word could be used but the bigger point is just because our actions of speaking out may not have enough impact we shouldn’t let that deter us.
We have seen him address publicly some of these issues the fans and public have presented regardless if he eventually brushes them off taking no other action.
On the overwhelming number of occasions, Jerry Jones has addressed topics via direct questioning by media members. He has visually demonstrated personal frustration during a few of those occasions, when the questioning directly related to his competency as a general manager (i.e. his inflexibility) or rational (I.e. a decades long refusal to induce Jimmy Johnson into the Ring of Honor).
Jones may have seriously addressed fans directly on relevant topics like PSLs in the past. It is exceeding doubtful he has been remotely and emotionally motivated by such issues for a long time.
During the past two decades, Jones has been ‘pressured’ by peer-to-peer confrontation. His type of personality is adverse into being cornered. However, it is the one realistic tactic of potentially coercing him into changing his day-to-day methodology also. Interested individuals
could capitalize on pushing Jones between his ears but usually defer to attacking his wallet instead, which has been utterly useless, again, for a long time.
Of course, the emotional tactic has only made teeny-tiny advances with the man as well. It also fails from lack of organization and frequency. This is why I replied earlier with ‘lol at slack’.
The man experiences practically zero motivating influence. It is akin to laying a six-inch length of rope on a flat surface and resting his wrists atop it. Sure. There is slack. There is a <expletive> ton of slack. Another person can try tying a knot around his wrists but how much slack would exist afterwards? Answer: A lot. Why? Not enough
rope exists for a viable knot.