Are we past the "pinch-me if this is real" phase on Miles?

Lets put this into a perspective reality, like Jerry Jones and fellow Texan Ross Perot it's obvious that Miles Austin/Austin Miles is not from this Planet and of Ferengi decent.

ferengi_ron.gif





He played well two weeks in a row but keep in mind it was vs two of the worst Pass Defenses in the NFL. The Ferengi are aparently hatching an incredible scheme to get one of their own a big money contract they are known to become very greedy and to have an insatiable love of money.
 
iceberg;3042860 said:
i refuse to play anymore till you back this up with a direct quote - not what you interpret "i'm happy with our qb" to mean.

you want a lot of lattitude for how things are phrased in the middle of an argument where you nailed a guy for 1 freakin word.

dig man, china ain't much further.

fail? the direct quote you say states he refuses to trade romo for ANYONE.

There are some very good QB's out there but I'm happy to have Romo as ours.

let me put that out there again in another color.

There are some very good QB's out there but I'm happy to have Romo as ours.

let me bold it up and make it pretty.

There are some very good QB's out there but I'm happy to have Romo as ours.

for the love of god you're right man! he clearly says he won't trade romo for ANYONE!

i stand before your powers of interpretation.

THAT you won't let others do as well.

you can't prove my point any more, but thank you for taking it this far.

Yes, guilty as charged. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together would arrive at the exact same conclusion. Anyone with a third grade education or higher can clearly see what he was implying. Despite the other QBs' fine qualities, he'd rather stick with Tony. Logical conclusion: no trade. Are you under the impression that he had to explicitly write "I wouldn't trade Tony for any other QB in the league"? Absurd. Keep moving those goal posts 'til you win.
 
bbgun;3042885 said:
Yes, guilty as charged. Anyone with two brain cells to rub together would arrive at the exact same conclusion. Anyone with a third grade education or higher can clearly see what he was implying. Despite the other QBs' fine qualities, he'd rather stick with Tony. Logical coinclusion: no trade. Are you under the impression that he had to explicitly write "I wouldn't trade Tony for any other QB in the league"? Absurd. Keep moving those goal posts 'til you win.

[youtube]yrbn785E5Bk[/youtube]

i did NOT say draw your own conclusions for your own benefit - i said GIVE ME FACTS - not speculation.

nowhere does it say he wouldn't trade tony, it says he's happy with our qb.

that alone must seriously piss you off. you also said dooms said "no one" - he didn't say that did he?

admit it - he didn't. you'll feel better when you set the truth free - BB!!! SET THE TRUTH FREE!!!!!!

you can do it. i got faith. and too much time on my hands.
 
There are some very beautiful women in the world, but I'm happy with my wife.
 
iceberg;3042888 said:
[youtube]yrbn785E5Bk[/youtube]

i did NOT say draw your own conclusions for your own benefit - i said GIVE ME FACTS - not speculation.

nowhere does it say he wouldn't trade tony, it says he's happy with our qb.

that alone must seriously piss you off.

Thread question: Which QBs would you rather have instead of Tony Romo?

His answer: There are some very good QB's out there, but I'm happy to have Romo as ours.

Logical conclusion: No trade. Otherwise, he would have coughed up some names. But why would he? He's happy with Tony and is sticking with him, to the exclusion of all others. Keep chasing your tail.
 
bbgun;3042791 said:
Here's one of those "Who would you trade trade Romo for?" threads:

http://cowboyszone.com/forums/showthread.php?t=155524&highlight=cutler

Here are the respondents who said "no one":


...

bbgun;3042897 said:
Thread question: Which QBs would you rather have instead of Tony Romo?

His answer: There are some very good QB's out there, but I'm happy to have Romo as ours. (editors note - i'm looking all over the damn place and even under the couch cushions, but i still don't see the words NO ONE in doom's quote!)

Logical conclusion: No trade. Otherwise, he would have coughed up some names. But why would he? He's happy with Tony and is sticking with him, to the exclusion of all others.

show me where he said "no one"

you used the quotes, not me.

and talk about moving the goalposts. "a logical conclusion would mean..."

in this instance it simply means whatever YOU want it to mean. till dooms chimes in to say you're right or wrong you have no idea.

do you? nah, didn't think so. go move the goalposts again and tell the world it's me.
 
Hopefully once Romo wins a Super Bowl, all his bashing will come to an end. Eli doesn't get bashed anymore, and he's a joke.

It took Peyton 6 years to win a Super Bowl. Now he's GOD to every NFL analyst. Why do you think Trent Dilfer is giving his input on national TV, instead of coaching a QB at Akron University? Because he won a Super Bowl.

That's all it takes in this league.
 
SilverStarCowboy;3042907 said:
:umm: Pot meet Kettle
yea, when i get good and pissed, all i do is crack jokes.

BUSTED ME!!!!!

where do i send your trophy to? i got an extra now. :cool:
 
Bob Sacamano;3042908 said:
this argument is going nowhere

i had more fun talking about my hair. back then i used too much conditioner.
 
iceberg;3042910 said:
i had more fun talking about my hair. back then i used too much conditioner.

I've never used conditioner a day in my life, until this morning

but I'm trying to grow my hair out now

not as long as yours though
 
iceberg;3042901 said:
show me where he said "no one"

:rolleyes:

Beyond lame. When you don't offer any names (and he didn't), that's the same as saying "no one." My error was thinking you could grasp something so simple or elementary. My bad.
 
bbgun;3042914 said:
:rolleyes:

Beyond lame. When you don't offer any names (and he didn't), that's the same as saying "no one."
Just like saying "cut" is the same for some as saying "trade" or "draft replacement."
 
bbgun;3042914 said:
:rolleyes:

Beyond lame. When you don't offer any names (and he didn't), that's the same as saying "no one."

no it's not. it's beyond stupid, i'll agree with that. but for you to take free reign at what people say and PRETEND it means what YOU want it to mean -

i'm going back to conditioner talk, you refuse to play in anything i've ever considered reality.

when i "quote" someone, it's usally a direct "quote" - not my interpration of what they would have said if they said what they meant.
 
theogt;3042916 said:
Just like saying "cut" is the same for some as saying "trade" or "draft replacement."

now look what you did bb.

you got theo and me on the same side...

you're a bad bad bb.
 
theogt;3042916 said:
Just like saying "cut" is the same for some as saying "trade" or "draft replacement."

Not even close, but thanks for the unsolicited snark as always.

"Me and my shadow ..."
 
iceberg;3042909 said:
yea, when i get good and pissed, all i do is crack jokes.

BUSTED ME!!!!!

where do i send your trophy to? i got an extra now. :cool:

I heard you got the first phone call when they started giving out trophies for density
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,917
Messages
13,905,044
Members
23,793
Latest member
Roger33
Back
Top