And yet it cost Brady/Belly a super bowl in 07.https://www.si.com/nfl/chiefs/gm-re...-in-week-17-provides-a-warning-for-the-chiefs
The win percentage of teams who rested their starters to those that didn’t, the rested teams had a staggeringly poor .333 win percentage in their first playoff game. The teams who did not rest their starters had a .786 win percentage in their first playoff game.
Super Bowl? Lol. I am not delusional. But If I can have my team play to win a regular season game and move into a higher seeding in the process by winning said game, I will indeed play to win every game.Yup, even if it costs us a super bowl, play 'em!!!!
Could you imagine if we drafted Tony Mandarich? There were "experts" who thought he should have gone #1This right here. Yes, the odds are against it, but the #2 seed is still in play. The odds were against the Cowboys in 1988 to get the 1st overall draft pick in ‘89, but Green Bay did the unthinkable and win their last game (against Detroit IIRC), thereby handing the Cowboys Aikman. It’s never over until the pleasingly plump matron sings.
LVE will be playing for another team next season, if he got hurt last night, it wouldn't effect us. He's a shadow of his rookie self.I was surprised that LVE played the whole game up till just the last few minutes. The other starters had been pulled much earlier.
I suspect the Eagles didn't play their starters because they figured if they lost (which they probably would have), it would've crushed their confidence going into the playoffs. This way they can pretend they only lost because the starters didn't play.They didn't play all the starters to be fair. But yeah I want my team to play to win and dominate particularly against the division.
I doubt that’s why they decided to rest them .I suspect the Eagles didn't play their starters because they figured if they lost (which they probably would have), it would've crushed their confidence going into the playoffs. This way they can pretend they only lost because the starters didn't play.
I think they could have pulled them at half.Not gonna lie I'd prefer to have pulled them earlier. But no major injuries so I'm not complaining.
Yes!This right here. Yes, the odds are against it, but the #2 seed is still in play. The odds were against the Cowboys in 1988 to get the 1st overall draft pick in ‘89, but Green Bay did the unthinkable and win their last game (against Detroit IIRC), thereby handing the Cowboys Aikman. It’s never over until the pleasingly plump matron sings.
We’re assuming it was solely his decision.If MM determined that this team needed to play the starters most of the game, there is not a single person in here that is qualified to question that decision.
It’s a safe assumptionWe’re assuming it was solely his decision.
I’m not sure how we can say with any confidence considering our meddling owners and dysfunctional organization.It’s a safe assumption