CZ POLL Are you happy with Dak Prescott as the quarterback of the Dallas Cowboys?

[plymkr]

let me add.

horrible pocket awareness
terrible against man coverage
no clue how to throw back shoulder passes
zero clue how to throw the 50/50 ball to his playmakers
horrible against good defenses
afraid to use his legs
no anticipation, waits until the receiver is open instead throwing his receiver open

Someone tell me what this clown is good at doing beside being a good leader.

I agree

 

[plymkr]

Should have some fun with all these Dak polls and create a graph that compares historical W-L record with the results of these polls. I think we’ll see a wee bit of correlation.

That’s a really good idea. That would be interesting how much a win or a loss sways people.

 

[KJJ]

The poll is still pretty lopsided, favoring those fans who aren’t happy with Dak but not nearly as lopsided as it was after the San Francisco loss. Funny how a win changes the opinion of some fans. Lol

 

[KJJ]

Just over 93% weren’t happy with Dak as the QB after the San Francisco loss. Currently just over 80% aren’t happy with him now. Had we beaten Philly on Monday night, it would probably be around 55 to 65% of the fans that aren’t happy with him.

https://cowboyszone.com/threads/are...arterback-of-the-dallas-cowboys.515169/page-2

 

[windward]

NFL personnel is with me.

They made YOU look silly the last 2 offseasons when you assured me that they'd agree with YOU and not with ME.

And now you can't pretend poll results don't matter to you. You're done.

He thinks Daniel Jones is better than Dak. Says it all.

 

[RoboQB]

The poll is still pretty lopsided, favoring those fans who aren’t happy with Dak but not nearly as lopsided as it was after the San Francisco loss. Funny how a win changes the opinion of some fans. Lol

There are 500 less votes than last week.
That plays a big part. Most who voted no, likely, didn't bother voting again. I only voted to see the total
participation.

 

[KJJ]

There are 500 less votes than last week.
That plays a big part. Most who voted no, likely, didn't bother voting again. I only voted to see the total
participation.

I’m sure there’s a lot of fans that are undecided now after Monday nights game.

 

[TwentyOne]

Dak is upper-half on the talent scale. Cowboys can win games with Dak, but he’s unlikely to carry the team by creating ‘Did you see THAT?’-type plays. He’s a pretty good bus driver. And when your starting QB is a bus driver - you need to be making a plan, and working a plan, to replace him.

Prescott to me is no bus driver and especially not a good one.
He is more of a showstopper and is very good at it.

No, you cant win with him. You may be able to win some games with him, but you cant actually win with him.

Of course when you are statisfied with a medicore team then you will always be hard pressed to make changes. But if you are interressted in winning something meaningful then - of course - you dont wait for someone who works out a plan that takes away all of possible risks.

Because this is what your whole argumention is based on: We need a working plan to replace him. No we dont need that and it is also wrong. Because football is not physics, were you find laws. And with those are able to forcast processes. Changing something in football is always a risk. Finding a new QB is a risk. So your approach should be to minimize that risk. Not trying to negate it.

One approach would be to draft a new QB every third year. Think about that idea: Investing something in the by far most important position in that sport!

But we dont invest into that position. And now posts like yours come up that feels like it tries to explain why we dont do exacly that.

 

[Captain-Crash]

Someone tell me what this clown is good at doing beside being a good leader.

well he's like a small dog, he likes to be carried. /double shrug

 

[Havic]

No.

 

[ksadler1]

I'm sticking with NO until he proves me wrong. I've read this book many times and it always has the same ending. I said during the Chargers game that we have a 40 mil dollar statue and nothing has changed. Yes, he had a much better game, but he can't do it CONSISTENTLY against the elite teams...

 

[Bob-Lillys-War]

The thing , the redzone issues are horrible .

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

The thing , the redzone issues are horrible .

when your most clutch scorer is the kicker...

 

[nate dizzle]

The poll is still pretty lopsided, favoring those fans who aren’t happy with Dak but not nearly as lopsided as it was after the San Francisco loss. Funny how a win changes the opinion of some fans. Lol

He had a solid game against the worst pass D in the league. Going to take a lot more than that to wash the taste of the SF failure out of my mouth. Play well and beat SF in January and I'll change my vote. Until then it's a hard no

 

[KJJ]

He had a solid game against the worst pass D in the league. Going to take a lot more than that to wash the taste of the SF failure out of my mouth. Play well and beat SF in January and I'll change my vote. Until then it's a hard no

I didn’t vote, because although I don’t think Dak is the answer I can’t say I’m not happy with him. I will say I’m not satisfied with him. I would like to have better than him, but that won’t be easy. There’s fans that would move on from him this very moment if they could. Despite his flaws, he’s still better than a lot of QBs in the league. We could do a lot worse.

 

[Bob-Lillys-War]

meh ...

 

[nate dizzle]

I didn’t vote, because although I don’t think Dak is the answer I can’t say I’m not happy with him. I will say I’m not satisfied with him. I would like to have better than him, but that won’t be easy. There’s fans that would move on from him this very moment if they could. Despite his flaws, he’s still better than a lot of QBs in the league. We could do a lot worse.

I'd move on simply because I don't think he has the talent or football IQ to ever lead this team to a SB, regardless of what the talent level of the team is, so continuing with him is a waste of time. That's my opinion of course.

 

[KJJ]

I'd move on simply because I don't think he has the talent or football IQ to ever lead this team to a SB, regardless of what the talent level of the team is, so continuing with him is a waste of time. That's my opinion of course.

I disagree that he doesn’t have the football IQ and isn’t a talented QB but he has become up and down. One week he can look great and the next week he can look terrible. If he wasn’t a talented QB, no way would he have remained the starting QB the past seven seasons. If he wasn’t a talented he wouldn’t be 27 games over 500 as a starting QB. The biggest problem with him the past three seasons is he’s regressed since his ankle injury and he’s not beating championship caliber teams. That’s a huge concern and why I don’t think he’s the answer. Yes, he beat Philly last season, but that was with Gardner Minshew. If we move on from him and end up with a lesser QB we could be sitting home for the playoffs practically every season.

 

[Beast_from_East]

Current results.....................approximately 15% of fans changed their votes.

It was roughly 95% unhappy with Dak to about 80% unhappy with Dak.

 

[Gangsta Spanksta]

Current results.....................approximately 15% of fans changed their votes.

It was roughly 95% unhappy with Dak to about 80% unhappy with Dak.

not really. about 150 voted this time versus almost 600 people voted last time. There is a silent majority