Basically middle of the pack. Games they win have been blowouts mostly so then u run the ball to run out the clock. They are a pass first team. Dak has 100 yards less than Dowdle rushing, dont think I want him running too much. They need 3 running backs like the eagles have that are decent.
Considering their slow start, 12th in the league is far better than "Dak basically has no running game" by a long shot.
If it stands for National Football League Most Variable Player, then it's spot on!
Thanks for buzzing by.
Need another RB. Have we had a 100yd+ game by a running back this year? Need to run the ball on the road to make the passing game more effective . Look at where the best team in the AFC + NFC is in rushing.
No, but that is by design. Pollard wasn't drafted to be a bell cow. And unless the OL and WR get key blocks downfield he isn't likely break a long one.
When you realize he can't even be competitive against the best teams. It's so bad that he looks like he doesn't even belong on the field in those games. And to add to matters this clown is holding the team hostage to the point where Jerry has to pay him because of the cap hit. No wonder people are done with him.
I hear ya.
Yeah, it's not about numbers, it's about an effective running game. When we had McFadden, he rushed for over a grand but wasn't all that effective.
That post was in response to "Have we had a 100yd+ game by a running back this year?"
Yes, I was expounding!!!!! It's not about the numbers it's about effectiveness.
You voted yes because it could be worse? Interesting.
It's strange thinking - to be so fearful of change because the replacement might be worse. The same thought process is what many used when debating whether to keep Garrett or toss him aside. "OMG! His replacement might be worse!" Keep the status quo, even though you are going nowhere with it. Makes perfect sense.
All I know is Cooper Rush did a damn good job last year starting
