StevenOtero
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,826
- Reaction score
- 1,216
Oh god. Please not him....
BigDFan5 said:This does not show he doesnt keep his cool, it shows he doesnt like petty bull**** and wants to focus on real issues
abersonc said:That's your interpretation.
It is entirely possible that he didn't like that the reporter was questioning his inconsistency or that he had been, basically caught in a lie. We'll never know why he said what he did.
I do know this -- saying "where were you when X happened" is a pretty damn common question to ask after a tragedy -- if he didn't see that coming or wasn't prepared it says something about his smarts.
BigDFan5 said:It would appear to me that you dont like Largents politics so no explaination will be good enough for you, and since this is not a political forum, I uess we cant go any further. I will say again if the media is more interested in trying to find inconsistencies in press releases about someones feelings on 9-11 instead of actual issues like what caused 9-11 then that says alot to me about the media. Either way he did not cuss a reporter, he used a cuss word big deal. He definately did not tell a reporter to go **** himself like you said earlier
I swore at a guy last week who was being rude to a saleslady. Does this mean I will swear at people I don't even know for the rest of my life?abersonc said:Let me ask this then. If the NFL commish swore at a reporter -- would folks interpret it like you are -- attributing it to the situation? or would it more likely be shown on tv over and over, generating bad press for the league?
I swore at a guy last week who was being rude to a saleslady.
That was you? In my defense I really had to pee and you were stopping progress.bbgun said:That was you?? In my defense, she had it coming.
abersonc said:Let me ask this then. If the NFL commish swore at a reporter -- would folks interpret it like you are -- attributing it to the situation? or would it more likely be shown on tv over and over, generating bad press for the league?
Thank you for the only opposition post to make sense.koolaid said:i would be opposed to this simply because of the fact that i dont want to mix politics and football, i think of football as an escape and a hobby. I don't claim to know much about Jeb, because honestly, i dont. He may be extremely qualified or just another joe for the job, i dont know. But i dont want to have to listen to people gripe about him or the job hes done because of his political offiliation. In short, i want football people doing football jobs and politicions doing whatever they do.
BigDFan5 said:If he said "thats bull****" I would see it for what it was.
abersonc said:Clearly though "what it is" depends on who is interpreting the event -- and that will differ.
But you apparently have insight into Largent's motivation that others don't. So you've got a real advantage there.
BigDFan5 said:No I am just looking at the situation from the view of someone who does not care what his politics are. You stated he cussed a reporter even going as far as saying he told one to **** himself. When in reality he did none of that he said a cuss word big whoop
abersonc said:apparently it was a big deal to some as he lost the gubernatorial election by a tiny margin.
little stuff like that can make a huge difference to some folks. to me, that makes it a big whoop
fiveandcounting said:I hope he is the RIGHT man for the job. Maybe CHAD Hutchinson will come back to the NFL, he's been HANGING about.
EGG said:Condi or Jeb,,, either one is okay by me,,,