Article: NFL.com Dallas wont make the playoffs

NickZepp

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,851
Reaction score
2,082
The Eagles are going to be a complete mess. They might win 3 games if they are lucky. We might make the playoffs by default because the division will be pretty bad. Giants are the only team I'm worried about and their defense still isn't good enough right now. How good we'll be will be determined by if we stay with the run game or not. We have coaches with a long history of not doing so when they don't have solid running backs. And a QB that will audible to a pass if he doesn't trust the backs.
 

jday

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,321
Reaction score
13,284
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000483160/article/five-teams-that-wont-return-to-the-playoffs

Five teams that won't return to the playoffs
_Sessler-65x90.jpg


Around The NFL scribe Conor Orr went out on a limb this week to predict five new teams that will earn playoff berths in 2015. Orr's crystal ball has the Saints, Bills, Eagles, Texans and Falcons all mining their way into January play, but who will they replace?

According to NFL Media research, at least four new teams have made the playoffs every year since the NFL adopted the 12-team format back in 1990. Over the past 10 campaigns, that average has climbed to more than five teams per season.

We expect nothing different in 2015, especially with so many big names changing zip codes in free agency. The draft will alter the picture, too, but most teams have a basic idea of what their rosters will look like heading into training camp.

It's barely April, but let's do this thing:

1. Cincinnati Bengals: Four years running, NFL fans have been forced to endure an annual January stink bomb from the Bengals. There's talent on this roster, but Cincinnati remains anchored to Andy Dalton as a middle-of-the-pack quarterback whose ceiling was discovered autumns ago. With Pittsburgh growing more powerful on offense and Baltimore still a threat inside the dog-eat-dog AFC North, theBengals will pay for standing pat at the most important position in sports.

2. Dallas Cowboys: Everything clicked for Dallas last season, pounding away at opponents withDeMarco Murray behind the league's grittiest offensive line. Murray is gone -- to Philly, of all places -- leaving the Cowboys to talk up a declining Darren McFadden as a secret weapon. We still see the 'Boys as a dark horse to trade for Adrian Peterson, but reality suggests the team will be forced to lean on a rookie runner. Dallas -- no fluke last season -- will compete into December, but Chip Kelly's revamped Eagles will own the last laugh.

3. Carolina Panthers: Coming off a 7-8-1 campaign, the Panthers have more work to do than any of last year's NFC playoff teams. Bouncing them has more to do with the Saints, though, who certainly don't feel like a team ready to give up on their Super Bowl dreams. Unlike Orr, I don't see two teams coming out of the South, and New Orleans offers the better quarterback and a dangerous combination of runners in Mark Ingram and C.J. Spiller. The Falcons are also bound to be better, making Carolina an outlier for the playoffs.

4. Detroit Lions: Green Bay remains the best team in the division and possibly the entire conference. Meanwhile, Detroit lost their top difference-maker on defense inNdamukong Suh along with Nick Fairley. We're not calling for the Lionsto tumble off a cliff -- not with Matthew Stafford throwing to Calvin Johnsonand Golden Tate -- but in the past four seasons with Stafford under center, Detroit has won 10, four, seven and 11 games. They'll pivot back to earth in 2015, leaving the door open for another conference heavy to nab a wild-card spot.

5. Denver Broncos: Denver's fortunes hinge entirely on what version of Peyton Manning we get come September. There's also the question of how he fits into Gary Kubiak's boot-heavy scheme minus pass-catching tight end Julius Thomas. While we don't expect the Broncos to force Manning into an attack that doesn't make the most of his gifts, changing up the regime midway through Peyton's Super Bowl-or-bust run in Denver was risky. It's a hunch, but the Broncos feel snakebit.

FIVE NEW TEAMS GOING TO PLAYOFFS


Mod edit: Content of article added

Oh yeah? Well...I predict Marc Sessler will never make the playoffs...
 

Sportsbabe

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,968
Reaction score
5,039
I meant to type "unless" and not "only if" in that post (puts my point backwards) but can't edit it now. My feelings are, unless we pick up AP or Gurley (basically an RB that the media can't spin to be worse than Murray), then they will keep riding the narrative that our run game is over because we let Murray walk. During the season, our O-line was the cause of our run game. Now that Murray is gone, HE is suddenly the reason. It's all BS and I can't wait until the first game of the season when Joe-Bob RB goes pounding the rock for 100+ yards to shut them up. Until then, business as usual for Cowboy fans (AKA we get pooped on in the off-season).

The easiest topic to sell clicks is to talk about how bad the Cowboys are/will be doing.

Lazy.

29 likes.
Love the "Joe-Bob" reference. I'm not adverse to stealing references I like :)
 

CATCH17

1st Round Pick
Messages
67,663
Reaction score
86,203
It's possible.


The Commanders have no chance.. They wanted to build their franchise around RG3 and brought in the worst coach possible for RG3's strengths. They dun goofed.


Philly and New York could just as easily finish 1 & 2 in the East as we could.

Hopefully we can still impose our will on the ground because our passing schemes are hot garbage and easy to defend.

If we have to rely on throwing the football we'll be 7-9 - 8-8 with a bunch of hollow stats that make it look like our passing game is effective when it provides nothing but average wins and losses.
 

ColeBeasley11

BruceCarter54
Messages
490
Reaction score
355
The Eagles are going to be a complete mess. They might win 3 games if they are lucky. We might make the playoffs by default because the division will be pretty bad. Giants are the only team I'm worried about and their defense still isn't good enough right now. How good we'll be will be determined by if we stay with the run game or not. We have coaches with a long history of not doing so when they don't have solid running backs. And a QB that will audible to a pass if he doesn't trust the backs.

Might win 3 games if they're lucky wow, that is ridiculous. We all hate the eagles but your being very ignorant.
 

NickZepp

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,851
Reaction score
2,082
Might win 3 games if they're lucky wow, that is ridiculous. We all hate the eagles but your being very ignorant.

No it's based on the offense they want to run not fitting their talent. Murray isn't an open field guy that offense needs. He wasn't even that at Oklahoma for the most part.The offensive lines they've had haven't been good at all in recent years. Bradford isn't a faster pace QB at the NFL level. And the receivers Philly has are not that good. And Philly isn't good on defense. And I don't feel they've gotten any better with the defensive players they've added.
 

DallasEast

Cowboys 24/7/365
Staff member
Messages
62,306
Reaction score
63,996
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
_Sessler-65x90.jpg

Hello.
My name's Marc Sessler.
Don't let my big doe-eyes fool you.
I publish whatever I want, when I want, how I...
oh look. headlights...​
 

RJ_MacReady

It's all in the reflexes
Messages
3,974
Reaction score
7,123
_Sessler-65x90.jpg

Hello.
My name's Marc Sessler.
Don't let my big doe-eyes fool you.
I publish whatever I want, when I want, how I...
oh look. headlights...​

http://s2.quickmeme.com/img/**/afe58246c6aa090384069415ca7ce5620b8ba5c7049cb19df75ff3187b3f1ff7.jpg
 

Seanleebaby

Member
Messages
50
Reaction score
9
I can't really see where it can be assumed that they improved their defense either.

I find it more than a bit ironic that Seattle quickly signed the cornerback the Eagles cut (Williams) to replace the one the Eagles signed away (Maxwell).

And, while the Eagles are now overstocked on quality inside linebackers, I don't see where they've effectively replaced Trent Cole.

I just don't get the assumptions being made that Chip Kelly simply 'knows what he's doing'. He looks more like Steve Spurrier than Jimmy Johnson to me at this point.

So the Eagles cut Trent Cole and now he's some world beater? Brandon Graham, who was resigned to replace Trent Cole, is a better player. Oh and he's 6 years younger too.

Plus, it's not like Trent Cole was beating Tyron Smith every other play. Where the Cowboys should be worried is our DL vs your interior OL. Fletcher Cox (2nd team AP last season) ate ron Leary over and over again last season
 
Last edited:

Seanleebaby

Member
Messages
50
Reaction score
9
No it's based on the offense they want to run not fitting their talent. Murray isn't an open field guy that offense needs. He wasn't even that at Oklahoma for the most part.The offensive lines they've had haven't been good at all in recent years. Bradford isn't a faster pace QB at the NFL level. And the receivers Philly has are not that good. And Philly isn't good on defense. And I don't feel they've gotten any better with the defensive players they've added.

This is also wrong. Murray isn't built for space? I saw him running in a lot of space last season with the Cowboys OL.

Chips offense is built around numbers. A skill player needs to beat one defender and go. LeSean McCoy liked to run around that defender, Murray likes to run through them.

And the Eagles OL hasn't been good for years? When in 2013 held the best run blocking O in the league. They had 3 injuries to start the season last year and still put up better run blocking numbers than the Cowboys.
 

Stash

Staff member
Messages
78,835
Reaction score
103,560
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
So the Eagles cut Trent Cole and now he's some world beater? Brandon Graham, who was resigned to replace Trent Cole, is a better player. Oh and he's 6 years younger too.

If Graham was 'better', why was Cole the starter instead? Typical Eagles rhetoric. Anybody they sign is an improvement and anyone they let go was 'never that good anyway...'

Plus, it's not like Trent Cole was beating Tyron Smith every other play. Where the Cowboys should be worried is our DL vs your interior OL. Fletcher Cox (2nd team AP last season) ate ron Leary over and over again last season

On Thanksgiving Day for sure. The rematch? Not so much. Surely not enough to prevent the Eagles getting whipped and tail-spinning right out of the division title and the playoffs.
 

Slashar00

Active Member
Messages
270
Reaction score
115
From what I've seen, a team that goes hog wild in free agency usually gets a little worse the following year. They might get better in the long run, maybe after 2-3 years, but not right away.

I predict the Eagles will go 9-7 because of this.

As for the Cowboys, I don't know yet. I think the Giants could make a turnaround though. They have another year in that system, and ODB is for real. He might become better than Dez. The Commanders will be better too. Like 6-10 better.
 

RJ_MacReady

It's all in the reflexes
Messages
3,974
Reaction score
7,123
This is also wrong. Murray isn't built for space? I saw him running in a lot of space last season with the Cowboys OL.
You are incorrect, Murray was not exceptional outside the tackles as say....McCoy. I don't care what he ran at his combine in underwear before he put on muscle, Murray doesn't have the greatest playing speed and regularly got out-flanked when trying to bend the run outside the tackles without blockers. When he did break past the LBs, he never had the speed to outrun them. Inside the tackles, he is a beast at turning 1-yard runs stuffed by a DT into a 3-4 yard dive under the scrum. His ability to scavenge extra yards is his attribute that we desperately need to replace.

If Chip uses him in his natural role and in some dump-offs, he's going to be productive. If he thinks he can, in any shape, be utilized as an outside runner like McCoy...well, you guys will be busy fending off the Commanders for honor of Divisional basement dwellers. Personally, I think Chip should have gone after C.J. Spiller instead of Murray.
 

NickZepp

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,851
Reaction score
2,082
If Graham was 'better', why was Cole the starter instead? Typical Eagles rhetoric. Anybody they sign is an improvement and anyone they let go was 'never that good anyway...'



On Thanksgiving Day for sure. The rematch? Not so much. Surely not enough to prevent the Eagles getting whipped and tail-spinning right out of the division title and the playoffs.
Graham in his best years has 5.5 sacks. Trent Cole consistently had more than 6 sacks a season over a long playing career and had 4 seasons of 10+ sacks. Last year he had one of his worst years in his career, and he still had one more sack than Graham. If he were really so good over a 5 year career he would have more than 13 career starts. Particularly on an Eagles defense that hasn't been that great overall the last few years.
 

Redball Express

All Aboard!!!
Messages
16,253
Reaction score
12,758
Awesome. All these negative predictions worked well for Dallas last season

I'm hoping it works again, too.

Yes..

maybe we lucked out with Philly collapsing and us getting Detroit in the first round.

But my guess is that the Cowboys KNOW they can win now..

something they never had before.

Playing as a team and playing 60 minutes of ballin' for a change is what changed their outcome.

If it was all strictly about talent..

the 9ers would have been repeat champs..

but they weren't.

Of course, you make a mistake thinking that last year's performance is an indicator of future performance.

Just ask the 2007 Cowboys.

it took 7 years to get over that collapse.

So we'll see.
 

coult44

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,875
Reaction score
7,653
Notice how the logic of a mediocre QB is the reason Bengals miss the playoffs? Yet somehow that same logic does not apply to the Eagles?

Exactly what I was going to post. What a crock not crap. He contradicted himself to the point of comedy.
 

ColeBeasley11

BruceCarter54
Messages
490
Reaction score
355
No it's based on the offense they want to run not fitting their talent. Murray isn't an open field guy that offense needs. He wasn't even that at Oklahoma for the most part.The offensive lines they've had haven't been good at all in recent years. Bradford isn't a faster pace QB at the NFL level. And the receivers Philly has are not that good. And Philly isn't good on defense. And I don't feel they've gotten any better with the defensive players they've added.

They have a good o line and chips system is suited fr north south runners like demarco, that's why him and lesean had heated arguments last year. The jags were 3-13 last year for some perspdctive.
 
Top