peplaw06;1643253 said:
Well if you want to believe that Belichick's was a first time violation, then go ahead. But this is Vick's first off the field conviction. And he wasn't illegally gambling on NFL games.
consorting w/ gamblers is enough to violate the player conduct policy
as well as breaking the law
peplaw06 said:
Vick's actions were damning on himself, but on the league? Do you really think that fans are suspicious that all other NFL players are involved in dogfighting? Can you say the same thing about other NFL teams and suspicions of cheating?
I didn't say dog-fighting, I said
players getting into trouble off the field, there have been more examples of that than coaches cheating
you don't comprehend very well, do you?
peplaw06 said:
that word is actually in the dictionary. I know it's hard to believe, but it's true. Whoops I said "dictionary." I'm probably stealing that word from someone else.
LOL, bbgun introduced shill to the board, and you ran w/ it
you're ripping from the resident punch-line, how do you feel?
peplaw06 said:
Great argument... We all know people only post ideas on message boards if they feel it can change the way things are done.
So what do you think about your boy?
just explaining why I'm not throwing my hat into the ring, nothing I can do about it
again, Goodell should have suspended Belichick 5 games, but he's getting fined and the Pats lose a 1st round pick