Vtwin;3154770 said:You expect the hopers to just sit quiet and take being called cowards?
Let's keep it real friend.
zrinkill;3154616 said:I said that in regards to anyone who gives up on a team before the season is over.
zrinkill;3154616 said:If that sounds like you .... then I could care less what you think.
zrinkill;3154616 said:But the point is I did not start the mud slinging in this thread .... the members of C.R.A.P. who invaded it in the very first page did.
zrinkill;3154616 said:You and your ilk (get a dictionary) cannot stand for a positive thread to be left alone.
Dodger12;3154843 said:My "ilk" don't have 40,000 plus posts with nothing to say.
iceberg;3154838 said:and i just have NO FREAKING IDEA why people can't post something positive about the team w/o the realists having to feel the need to peepee in their cheerios.
Signals;3154849 said:Oprah would be very proud of you guys.
Cover 2;3154841 said:I think we all (people who are positive and negative) need to remember that no matter how we view the team we all want the same thing. A victory against the Saints, and then a Super Bowl victory.
We may express ourselves differently, and have different ideas about where the team is, but we all want a Cowboys victory. Otherwise we wouldn't spend so much time on this board.
iceberg;3154838 said:from what i read it wasn't specific to anyone till someone stood up and went HEY!!!???
and i just have NO FREAKING IDEA why people can't post something positive about the team w/o the realists having to feel the need to peepee in their cheerios.
Cover 2;3154841 said:I think we all (people who are positive and negative) need to remember that no matter how we view the team we all want the same thing. A victory against the Saints, and then a Super Bowl victory.
We may express ourselves differently, and have different ideas about where the team is, but we all want a Cowboys victory. Otherwise we wouldn't spend so much time on this board.
I guess it's just human nature to divide into factions.Dodger12;3154856 said:It's such a simple premise that I'm shocked so few get it without getting their panties in a wad. Well said Cover 2.
iceberg;3154845 said:758 with nothing to say isn't much of an improvement.
Vtwin;3154864 said:I asked if hoping was the same as believing and was told that hoping was "the cowards way out".
Then killer jumped in with his rambling about "shutting the cowards up".
You're right, individuals were not specified. But come on man, people are going to read the big bold letters hidden between the lines.
That kind of talk is going to draw return fire every time.
I have NO FREAKING IDEA why people can't just share their thoughts without calling out the other side every single time.
What do you think would happen if someone started a thread talking about our poor chances to win? (hypothetically of course)
Do you think the believers wouldn't be all over that?
Dodger12;3154868 said:Only in your own mind.
iceberg;3154869 said:ie - people are going to see what they want to see and react to what they *THINK* the other person said instead of clarifying the point.
i don't deny it won't get "return fire every time" - i just say it's stupid when you're not even sure he's talking about you - just "assume" it and start arguing like that was his point.
as for your last question, there's not enough "believers" to cover all the "we suck" threads these days. so that side is just as frustrated as the other side, just over something different.
Cover 2;3154867 said:I guess it's just human nature to divide into factions.
bbgun;3154883 said:That does it. Put up your dukes.
http://img707.*************/img707/1655/osullivan.jpg
bbgun;3154883 said:http://img707.*************/img707/1655/osullivan.jpg
DallasCowpoke;3154898 said:ICK!! I see ridge!