Ben Maller: "Dak Prescott is a stat-bandito"

[OmerV]

We see reading with understanding isn’t a strong suit of you Dak apologists smh. Nothing your posting has jack expletive to do with what that tweet mentioned. Y’all are too transparent with your convenient obtuseness.

You are so blindly intent on going after Dak, and me, that you didn't post a single iota of substance. Hell. I even said Dak has to bear his share of the blame, so even aside from posting no substance, it makes no sense to claim I apologized for him.

 

[nhcowboysfan]

Dak definitely bears his share of blame. There is no question about that. But the "stat bandito" comment is kind of nonsensical . Why would anyone expect when the Cowboys got way behind they wouldn't air it out trying to score points? That would be the case for any team with any QB in that situation.

Very astute observation and correct. Moreover, his stats are also the result of his contributions to several of the teams that we blew out this year. Was Dak supposed to hand the ball to the RB all the time so as not score too many points?

 

[BoysForLife]

Dak had 1 TD, 2 INTs, and less than 200 yards passing with 6 mins left in the game and the Cowboys were down 48-16.

and let's be real clear here, it would have been 0 TD, 3 INT and less points if the GB linebacker doesn't drop a gift wrapped pick at the goal line just before halftime.

 

[Philmonroe]

You are so blindly intent on going after Dak, and me, that you didn't post a single iota of substance. Hell. I even said Dak has to bear his share of the blame, so even aside from posting no substance, it makes no sense to claim I apologized for him.

How did I go after Dak when my whole post is about your lack of reading comprehension? Make it make sense. If I didn’t post any substance you’re just not that smart regarding your own post tbh. What I posted made complete sense unlike your post.

 

[Strykerscm]

Honestly Dak is such a polarizing bad player, compared to qbs with actual chops, that is kills the fanbase. Hell there’s a ton of actual cowboys who know in their heart and heads that they cannot win with him. But they make a lot of money and that really is more important than winning.

I wish the base would come together and make this place a tough job to get again.

 

[1972COWBOY]

 

[McKDaddy]

What are you talking about? The point late in games where the score is lopsided is what we were discussing.

I was responding to your claim that the Cowboys always keep Dak in games and let him run up stats. The fact Rush came in 7 times to do exactly the opposite responds directly to that claim. That was the context.

I made the distinction clear. Don't know what else to tell ya.

 

[Captain-Crash]

Dak had 1 TD, 2 INTs, and less than 200 yards passing with 6 mins left in the game and the Cowboys were down 48-16.

looks like MVP stats to the stans, lol

 

[Captain-Crash]

WHERE IS THE END OF SEASON DAK POLL ??


ARE WE AFRAID TO HURT FEELINGS?

well, there are a few guys/gals still crying. We can't put it up yet. You have to give them a month or until next year to get over the choking again.

 

[Captain-Crash]

It was hilarious listening to him talk about how the offense turned it on late. The important part he left out is that it happened right after the Packers defense put in backups and went into prevent mode the entire 2nd half.

quit....

 

[CT Dal Fan]

I’m tired of this stupid logic. Nobody says this expletive when Dak is being praised so stop saying it when he is getting criticized. No flip he isn’t the only person that messed up but that isn’t the point smh.

I know it's not the point. Nothing wrong with saying Dak sucked because he did. But he was "A" reason they lost, not the "ONLY" reason.

How is it stupid logic to point out the defense was bad when they did not have a sack, a turnover, literally left guys uncovered for 40 yards, and got gashed against the run? They were just as bad at their job as Dak was at his.

Nobody on this team played well, including Dak. It's not stupid logic to point this out, it's stating a fact. This was a team defeat. People did point out the defense was bad when Dak played well- see the Seattle game for instance. In this case no unit pulled the other one out of the fire. Everyone stood around and let the Packers pull them around on a leash.

 

[Philmonroe]

I know it's not the point. Nothing wrong with saying Dak sucked because he did. But he was "A" reason they lost, not the "ONLY" reason.

How is it stupid logic to point out the defense was bad when they did not have a sack, a turnover, literally left guys uncovered for 40 yards, and got gashed against the run? They were just as bad at their job as Dak was at his.

Nobody on this team played well, including Dak. It's not stupid logic to point this out, it's stating a fact. This was a team defeat. People did point out the defense was bad when Dak played well- see the Seattle game for instance. In this case no unit pulled the other one out of the fire. Everyone stood around and let the Packers pull them around on a leash.

I already explained why it’s stupid logic or moreso why I don’t like when people do that bs. That’s the better way of saying what I truly meant not logic. Tired of a post about Dak turning into whataboutism when this bs never happens no where else. You can count the times when the D messes up and folks are like well Dak didn’t play good either so stop with this junk when Dak getting roasted.

 

[Cowboysheelsreds058]

Dak had 1 TD, 2 INTs, and less than 200 yards passing with 6 mins left in the game and the Cowboys were down 48-16.

LOL, Lex with the stats to backup his claims.

 

[OmerV]

How did I go after Dak when my whole post is about your lack of reading comprehension? Make it make sense. If I didn’t post any substance you’re just not that smart regarding your own post tbh. What I posted made complete sense unlike your post.

You're still just blindly slinging insults without posting any substance.


My post clearly blamed Dak for his part in the loss, and then I went on to say I didn't like the "stat-bandito" comment, and I explained why."

You said I apologized for Dak, which I did not, you threw out a few mindless insults, and you acted as if nothing I said had anything to do with what the OP said even though he actually did talk about Dak bearing blame and used the term "stat bandito".


Now you're back throwing out mindless insults again, and again, with no substance.

 

[OmerV]

I made the distinction clear. Don't know what else to tell ya.

The distinction you made clear is that you have a double standard.

 

[DanTanna]

This HAS to be Dak's new name - The Stat-Bandito

He's a career Stat-Bandito - all of us have been saying that for YEARS! Garbage time, weak teams, you name it that is 80% of his career stats.

 

[Philmonroe]

You're still just blindly slinging insults without posting any substance.


My post clearly blamed Dak for his part in the loss, and then I went on to say I didn't like the "stat-bandito" comment, and I explained why."

You said I apologized for Dak, which I did not, you threw out a few mindless insults, and you acted as if nothing I said had anything to do with what the OP said even though he actually did talk about Dak bearing blame and used the term "stat bandito".


Now you're back throwing out mindless insults again, and again, with no substance.

This guy has learned the word of the day “mindless insults” and is just going to run with it lol. No insults at all just you being silly in this instance and not wanting to be accountable for said silliness. Nothing you said had to do with the OP at all. You gave some stupid logic on why he wasn’t a stat bandito. Maybe in your little circle that logic makes sense but elsewhere nah my friend.

 

[khiladi]

Pulling the starters in a playoff game is something only the winning team does. The losing team has nothing to lose by keeping the regulars in there.

Yes they do, injuries… and giving reps to other guys to see how they perform

 

[OmerV]

This guy has learned the word of the day “mindless insults” and is just going to run with it lol. No insults at all just you being silly in this instance and not wanting to be accountable for said silliness. Nothing you said had to do with the OP at all. You gave some stupid logic on why he wasn’t a stat bandito. Maybe in your little circle that logic makes sense but elsewhere nah my friend.

Mindless insults are a very good description of how you post.

As for the tweet at the heart of this ....

Do you really deny that the tweet says Dak bears blame?

And do you deny that the tweet used the term "stat bandito"

Because the only way for you to claim my response had nothing to do with the tweet is to deny those comments were made.

That's what logic is.


As for your logic, you somehow decided that my saying Dak bears blame for this loss amounts to apologizing for Dak. lol.

 

[OmerV]

Yes they do, injuries… and giving reps to other guys to see how they perform

If the team loses there isn't another week left in the season, so injury isn't the concern

Even in blowouts, playoffs are not considered exhibition time to evaluate prospects.

After 6 seasons in Dallas do you really think the Cowboys needed to give reps to Rush to find out how he performs?