different view of conf realignment.
what happens to those that leave competitively.
Big 12 defections:
Nebraska
Big XII 1996 - 2010: 139-55 / win 71.65% / Bowls: 13 of 15 years (86.66%)
Big Ten 2011 - 2021: 71-64 / win 52.59% / Bowls: 6 of 11 years (54.54%)
Colorado has also seen diminishing returns since moving to the PAC, but they always struggled so it's really them going from not good to absolutely abysmal. While in the Big XII they were 93-91 for a just over .500 win rate. In the PAC, they're 47-83 for a win rate of 36.15%. They've made a bowl in 2 of the past 11 years, while in the Big XII at least they enjoyed a 54% bowl rate.
Colorado
Big XII 1996 - 2010: 93-91 / win 50.54% / Bowls: 8 of 15 years (53.33%)
PAC 2011 - 2021: 47-83 / win 36.15% / Bowls: 2 of 11 years (18.18%)
As for Missouri and Aggy's move to the SEC - Missouri stayed almost exactly the same overall but had built a powerful program right before leaving that has went downhill rapidly while Aggy is the only team to have improved (record wise). Giving credence to my theory that although Aggy probably benefited from better recruiting after the SEC move, in reality, their improved record stems from the top-heavy SEC conference and winning 4 non conf games yearly.
Missouri
- Big XII 1996 - 2011: 112-84 / win 57.14% / Bowls - 10 of 16 years (62.5%)
- SEC 2012 - 2021: 69-51 / win 57.5% / Bowls: 5 of 10 years (50%)
Texas A&M
- Big XII 1996 - 2011: 113-86 / win 56.78% / Bowls: 11 of 16 years (68.75%)
- SEC 2012 - 2021: 85-41 / win 67.46% / Bowls: 9 of 10 years (90%)
Is the grass generally greener? Nebraska fans would kill to be back in the Big 12. Admin would never go for it but they actually LOST AAU status after joining.