Bledsoe or McNabb?

Vintage said:
Career Averages

McNabb:
58.4%
6.60 ypa
2.03 TD per INT
84.1 rating

Bledsoe:
57.3% completion rate
6.64 ypa
1.23 TD per INT
77.3 rating


If McNabb is 8 years of crap, what is Bledsoe? A lifetime of crap?
Click to expand...


Good one. :lmao:
 
kartr said:
McNabb is also the more complete qb and has carried a team for years, while Bledsoe can't get teams to the playoffs, even when he has good receivers and running backs, which he's had his whole career.
Click to expand...

oh really?

So he didnt make it to the playoffs in New england then. And the last time i checked, Mcnabb never lead his team to the playoffs. There Def did. Mcnabb is a good QB that has mobility and a Decent arm,

At there age now, i would take Mcnabb for the long run, simply because i know our D is better than that of the eagles, and so no doubt that we would make it to the playoffs, and add in the fact that Mcnabb numberrs werre real good with TO catching te ball.

I would take BLedose for a year or two simply because he has the better arm
 
Alexander said:
And that demonstrates that the hype machine carried him. I've never seen much leadership. Like Quincy Carter, he likes to state that he is, but his actions betray that. He had his chance to step forward and seize control of the Owens situation. He didn't. Ask virtually any NFL player. A QB who is the leader would have challenged Owens and probably do more than verbally skirmish via the media. McNabb tolerated Owens yelling at him on the sidelines for crying out loud. That's very weak.

His style isn't to get in people's faces and challenge them. He'd rather skip around with a silly grin on his face and "have fun". That's not leadership.



How so? He had disputes with the coaching staff. But I never heard of him being a spineless jellyfish.



Nor can you state that McNabb has much beyond his inflated social status to distinguish himself as a leader either.
Click to expand...

Do the research. There were most certainly players on the Bills team who were happy to see Bledsoe gone. This is really a pointless discussion. This perception of Bledsoe being a leader or not is inconclusive. What has Bledsoe done here to have people claim that Buffalo was wrong or right?

Same goes for McNappie. Is he a leader? There will always be guys in the club house who don't agree but you look to what the team says. They make the decisions. The team supports McNappie. That's the way it is. You ask what McNabb has done? Well, he lead his team to something like 3 consecutive NFC championship games. Not just a case of being the QB but actually being a player that has been directly responsible, through his play, for there success.

The question here is who is the better QB? All of this BS about Bledsoe being the better leader or whatever is subjective. Bledsoe has done nothing to seperate himself as the superior leader. To say he has, is not a factual statement. It is an opinion. The numbers are quantifiable. They tell the story. If you can identify how Bledsoe has proven himself to be the better leader and thus, the better QB, proceed.
 
Phoenix-Talon said:
Back to the drawing board ...!:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

So you mean to tell me, that if the eagles had a 15-20 ranked Def during their runs, (Before TO mind you) that your team would have still made the playoffs?

Seriously doubt that
 
summerisfunner said:
really? doesn't the supporting cast have something to do with a QB?
Click to expand...

Sure but IMO, the better supporting cast offensively has been in Dallas, the last few years. I believe that McNabb is a better QB at this point in his career. He's the better QB with less talent available offensively. That is what I am refering to. Besides, the better talent might show up in the passing numbers but the TOs and sacks taken are a different matter IMO. The fact that McNabb takes fewer sacks is not a result of superior talent IMO. It is the result of his god given abilities. Basically, he produces more TDs, commits fewer TOs and avoids sacks better, thus putting his team in fewer poor situations on down and distance. Never mind his ability to create. A different discussion all together.
 
Phoenix-Talon said:
" " " " ...as a football Fan who will be in the HOF first: Bleedsoe
Click to expand...

:lmao: Yeah, I'll be waiting for McSlobb to get in the HOF! :rolleyes:

I really hope you were joking....
 
dargonking999 said:
So you mean to tell me, that if the eagles had a 15-20 ranked Def during their runs, (Before TO mind you) that your team would have still made the playoffs?Seriously doubt that
Click to expand...

Uncertain what your point is ...my comments were attributed toward the posters remarks that McNabb never lead his team to a playoff game -- that's
preposterous!
 
Phoenix-Talon said:
Uncertain what your point is ...my comments were attributed toward the posters remarks that McNabb never lead his team to a playoff game -- that's
preposterous!
Click to expand...
Especially since lead is a mineral and led is the action of leading.

:wink2:
 
Sign language for "Donovan McNabb":

mini-choking%20man44.jpg
 
Comparing Bledsoe with McNabb is like comparing Eddie George when he was a Cowboy to Westbrook.

We would have some here saying that George is the better back.
 
Hostile said:
Especially since lead is a mineral and led is the action of leading.

:wink2:
Click to expand...


I'm confused with your statement that lead is a mineral, then you lead us to a dictionary that says the following; :confused:

  1. To show the way to by going in advance.
  2. To guide or direct in a course: lead a horse by the halter. See Synonyms at guide.
    1. To serve as a route for; take: The path led them to a cemetery.
 
kartr said:
Better to choke in the superbowl than to choke in the regular season. If you choke in the regular season, you don't go to the playoffs.
Click to expand...

Kinda like McChoke last year, huh?

All of last year
 
5Stars said:
I'm confused with your statement that lead is a mineral, then you lead us to a dictionary that says the following; :confused:


To show the way to by going in advance.
  1. To guide or direct in a course: lead a horse by the halter. See Synonyms at guide.
    1. To serve as a route for; take: The path led them to a cemetery.
Click to expand...
Hos wasn't serious ...hence, my use of the word "cole" versus "coal."
 
stasheroo said:
Kinda like McChoke last year, huh?

All of last year
Click to expand...

Yeah, I don't get that! "It's better to choke in the Superbowl"! :eek:

Really? In front of the WHOLE WIDE WORLD? That's better?

No, I would rather have the QB choke, if he's a choker like McSlobb, choke in a playoff game...then it would not be as embarissing....:lmao:

But, you have to remember, this is Krankcase that is making these statements...:rolleyes:

:star:
 
5Stars said:
I'm confused with your statement that lead is a mineral, then you lead us to a dictionary that says the following; :confused:

  1. To show the way to by going in advance.
  2. To guide or direct in a course: lead a horse by the halter. See Synonyms at guide.
    1. To serve as a route for; take: The path led them to a cemetery.
Click to expand...

Lead is present tense, led is in the past, which is what his sentence was implying.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Staff online

Members online

... and 165 more.
Total: 6,241 (members: 265, guests: 5,976)

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
465,211
Messages
13,858,250
Members
23,788
Latest member
mattyice
Back
Top