I agree with your eyeball test methods. This is a classic example of stats not telling the whole story. I know these stat guys don't believe it, but numbers don't win games.
Numbers clearly don't win games. They measure how games are won, so that people can better figure out what works and doesn't work.
And they do that, because the 'eyeball test' is clearly subjective, as this very thread shows. You guys can describe your eyeball tests, and I sit here wondering what games you were watching, because to me, the issues were much bigger on defense than they were on offense. Especially against ATL. Clearly, we can't both be right if we're seeing opposite things, which makes eyeballing it pointless unless you just want to group people into two groups without any support whatsoever for which group is right and which is wrong.
The support is where the stats come in. From there, it's a rational debate about whether or not the right things are being measure and if they're being measured accurately.