Rockport
AmberBeer
- Messages
- 46,580
- Reaction score
- 46,004
It’s a year end stat.that stat is from when they were healthy? based on points allowed in the first 7 weeks i'd doubt that. yards per game is not a good indicator.
It’s a year end stat.that stat is from when they were healthy? based on points allowed in the first 7 weeks i'd doubt that. yards per game is not a good indicator.
Yeah, it makes perfect sense that they’d love Forbes. I think he walks into the league and is a good player as a rookie.Good stuff! Thanks for posting! He is one of the best in evaluating draft talent. Makes you think our defense is on the verge of something special. I am more worried about the offense and the kicking game, but our defense could be among tops in the league. By the way, reports are coming out now that they loved Forbes, which we both loved, but Mazi could potentially be that final piece to our defense, warming up to the pick!
Guys like what?They get guys like that every year.
Guys that play in the oline.Guys like what?
Guys that play in the oline.
which is irrelevant to the comment that was made.It’s a year end stat.
How so? It shows that the defense had some issues and is NOT arguably the best defense in the NFL.which is irrelevant to the comment that was made.
he said when fully healthy.How so? It shows that the defense had some issues and is NOT arguably the best defense in the NFL.
Happens every year, but when you have a good season, you always picking the less talented prospects at the end of each rd.Yeah, it makes perfect sense that they’d love Forbes. I think he walks into the league and is a good player as a rookie.
It makes me want to just stop looking at draft prospects because the players I want in Dallas always go somewhere else.
No team is fully healthy.he said when fully healthy.
I like the depth that was improved in free agency and the draft this off seaason...and keeping cash flow on a strong positive right now.Precisely.
They couldn't stop the run without interior guys and they were toast outside once we were starting Wright/Joseph.
But early in the year a fully healthy defense went 5-1 with the 30th rated offense under Cooper Rush.
You can see why they hit the combo there in the off-season.
They added a 1T, a LB, a starting CB and drafted another for depth.
Are you trying to say that Walenzko and or Chuma are magically going to be great starter
Nobody would know. Nobody knew that Steele would or Tyler B..Are you trying to say that Walenzko and or Chuma are magically going to be great starters this year?
Why this attack on half of our team?They were the #12th rated defense. Hardly arguably one of the best.
I’m a realist.Why this attack on half of our team?
I don't get the point of this question. Neither one is projected to be a starter.Are you trying to say that Walenzko and or Chuma are magically going to be great starters this year?
smhNo team is fully healthy.
You sound like Jerry. Let’s put on a show winning be dammed!Running the ball more is the worst decision this offense can make. They ran it way too much.
"Run the ball, stop the run, control TOP," as an approach, is the best way to ensure you can't win a Super Bowl. None of the league's serious contenders do that.
I don't hate the draft, but the only way they improve is to get more consistent in the passing game.
Yup LB can stay home for their reads as opposed to having to charge on any run look. You don't need heavy boxes all the time.
The way he attacks double teams I want to see him picking on stunts. He will crush lanes open.
No such thing as a dominant D. The defense in the playoffs against SF was about as good as you can expect, giving up just 313 yards and 3.5 ypc.You sound like Jerry. Let’s put on a show winning be dammed!
We drafted to stop the run and improve our overall D. Even in todays NFL a dominant D is still possible!!! A dominant D helps Dak immensely. Less pressure on him to make plays.
My only issue was not picking a plug in G in the 2nd. I like the TE’s we already have and think we needed more help on the O line than at TE.