jobberone;3919351 said:
I think that OL is more of an immediate need than DE. But that doesn't mean we need to draft a RT to start this year. I don't see anyone knowing how well Colombo is and what he and/or Young can do this year. It seems most are just assuming Colombo is finished and Young will not be able to contribute. And I'm not saying I wouldn't take an OT in the first round this year. I'm not certain even the team knows how much they can depend on Colombo or Kosier this year. And that leaves Davis out of the conversation.
Nobody needs to assume that Colombo is done. His play pretty much advertised it on a weekly basis.
And you can't even really talk about Young. He was drafted late last year. If he didn't warrant playing time last season while Colombo was failing week-in and week-out, he's not going to improve enough to be counted on this season.
Without first hand knowledge of all the factors we can't really critique the decision of whether to draft Smith or Constanzo or even Sherrod or Solder.
IMO, we need to draft OL for the future and for immediate competition. Drafting in the lower part of the first round may end up being as good as the top.
Having said all that I'd still draft Smith because we need a swing tackle. And I am making an assumption that our current swing tackle won't be with the team this year. I can't even know that with certainty.
I wasn't advocating for any specific OT. I was just saying that I don't think it's realistic to consider a group of players to be rated equally if some of them play at a position of need and other don't.
If all things are equal and one guy plays at a position of need, I don't think it makes sense to be "okay" with landing either of them. At some point, position of need has to come into play. If there was a DE who was just absolutely the better pick than an OT, fine. But, if the Cowboys have a couple DEs and a couple of OTs rated the same, I can't get on board with trading back with the assumption that any of the lot will work.
Of course, they could be considering position in their ranking I suppose. Something I really didn't put much thought to before. I guess they could view the DEs as being superior in a straight-up sense but are elevating the OTs based on need.
Who knows. Either way, I think if a team has a group of guys slotted equally, position should win out.
And yes, Dallas does need to draft OL for the future but between the draft and free agency, they need a RT. They absolutely cannot go without making a move at that position.