Broaddus: Trade Rumor
- Thread starter Pessimist_cowboy
- Start date
RS12
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 32,321
- Reaction score
- 29,212
I dont even think they have two NFL caliber safties on the roster.
Galian Beast
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 14,735
- Reaction score
- 7,457
They aren't safety depth, they are special teams players. I'd be surprised if both make the team.
1. scandrick 2. carr 3. claiborne 4. jones 5. patmon 6. white
1. church 2. wilcox 3. mccray 4. heath
that's 10 DBs... I'm thinking they keep 9.
Stash
Staff member
- Messages
- 78,648
- Reaction score
- 102,989
Yeah. Not that I'm thrilled about it, but I think they keep Heath too, mainly for special teams. But what I don't want to see is Danny (defensive liability) McCray on the 53.
Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
- Messages
- 62,481
- Reaction score
- 67,294
Really depends on the back they are offering.
Cowboy4ever
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 5,140
- Reaction score
- 4,395
I think we keep all 6 CB since 2 can also play safety. My guess is that Heath gets cut or McCray gets cut. I don't see any need to keep two ST aces especially since one of them will be inactive on game day, I am almost certain.
Alexander
What's it going to be then, eh?
- Messages
- 62,481
- Reaction score
- 67,294
I agree, but the bag of beans better be able to run the football.
AsthmaField
Outta bounds
- Messages
- 26,466
- Reaction score
- 44,467
They better not trade Patmon away... that guy is going to be a good player.
Claiborne? I would mind way less with him. Patmon has the exact mental make-up Dallas wants on their team.
Claiborne? I would mind way less with him. Patmon has the exact mental make-up Dallas wants on their team.
ActualCowboysFan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 6,416
- Reaction score
- 9,498
Blount, despite his baggage, would be a nice complimentary piece for their RBC. I can buy the idea of a committee, but that seems like something that demands a variety of siill sets. The three guys they have right now seem to overlap in their strengths.
CATCH17
1st Round Pick
- Messages
- 67,451
- Reaction score
- 85,626
Im with you but if we could get a Defensive Tackle with a bit of upside i'd do it.
Safety? ehhhh.. They better be a good one.
RB? I'd take that too if it's a guy like Kniles Davis or Tre Mason.
TellerMorrow34
BraveHeartFan
- Messages
- 28,358
- Reaction score
- 5,076
Unless that team calling has a big time RB that they're willing to hand over to us I'd rather we keep our CB depth.
CATCH17
1st Round Pick
- Messages
- 67,451
- Reaction score
- 85,626
Blounts an idiot and Belichick has been the only coach to get productivity out of that guy.
Bigdog
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,815
- Reaction score
- 11,455
Switch Patmon for Caiborne and I am for it. Patriots won't be though.
CATCH17
1st Round Pick
- Messages
- 67,451
- Reaction score
- 85,626
Forte is the only "bigtime" RB I think could even possibly get moved because the Bears really aren't expected to do much.
The rest play on pretty good teams.
We could've just taken Leveon Bell over Gavin Escobar *ducks*
Cowboys22
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,507
- Reaction score
- 11,384
No need to trade solid depth at CB or OL right now. Camp and preseason games can erode that depth in a blink of the eye. A team wanting to contend does not sacrifice quality depth for future draft picks and unless someone is offering a very good starting caliber RB or S, then no way. Why trade now when its likely similar players will be available after final cuts?
jazzcat22
Staff member
- Messages
- 79,678
- Reaction score
- 99,808
Garret said today [in season ticket holder press conference] when asked about bringing guys in for workouts. He said yes, had 2 today, 3 a few days ago, and 3 before that. As a team you always bring in guys to workout to see if you can improve the team. Plus as guys get injured, you need to have players available to bring in.
So yes, that goes along with teams probably calling other teams all the time about possibilities.