He's definitely on the risky side of average, but nothing approaching Eli for example.
I wouldn't exactly hold Romo's risky nature against him. At least not on this team.Nothing like two Super Bowl victories, both involving clutch passes, to remove the stigma of "risky side of average."
I wouldn't exactly hold Romo's risky nature against him. At least not on this team.
That's why I said he needed a coach to manage him - early. I ultimately blame Jerry Jones because he has wanted to feature Romo and feature the high-flying passing game. While that puts people in the stands, I don't know if it's the way to win championships. Usually, the team that wins the Super Bowl has a strong running game to complement a good quarterback.
Romo is just trying to do what he has to do to win. But he's Farvian. He needed someone who understood this to rescue him from himself. Bill Parcells did, but Bill was too old to hang in there. I think he just got tired and simply didn't have the energy to stick it out with the Cowboys. Wade didn't have the personality to do it (he was too easy going and was going to do whatever Jerry wanted), and then he was hamstrung when Jerry picked Garrett to serve on Wade's staff.
Romo was handled all wrong. And now, I fear, he'll never get to the Super Bowl because we've wasted his better days. No question, he's a great talent. Anyone who denies this is either blind or simply stubborn. But ... he does press too much unnecessarily, and that's because we haven't built a scheme or a team around him to use him properly.
If the team Troy led were built around Romo, there's no question in my mind he'd be wearing a Super Bowl ring by now. Heck, if Romo were on the Giants, he'd have two Super Bowl rings right now, IMO.
It's really a shame that we had the quarterback, but we just couldn't put the necessary pieces around him for him to deliver us a championship.
I've said for a long time that we wasted Romo's best years with bad coaching. When this era of the Cowboys end and we look back, I'm afraid that we will just say, "what a waste."
On this team? You could make just as good a case that he doesn't press enough.he does press too much unnecessarily
Well, prove your case. Show some sudden dip in record that is not surmountable this very season.
On this team? You could make just as good a case that he doesn't press enough.
Well, prove your case. Show some sudden dip in record that is not surmountable this very season.
How not? Teams with defensive performances like ours finish 4-12 on average.How so?
I don't really have to prove anything. The Cowboys have wasted 8 years of his career. He has nothing to show for it..He has one more playoff win than Quincy Carter. People think this team is going to compete for a SB in the next year or two but I don't see it. By the time this team is fixed we'll be on our next QB.
The similar logic would apply to the statement, if I wasn't so good looking I'd be rich now.
How not? Teams with defensive performances like ours finish 4-12 on average.
I'll wait and see where we draft before I can look forward to that.I have given up on him and am looking forward to drafting a new QB.
My opinion is a little different than some of you. I think it is possible with the right coach and everything Romo could lead his ream to the superbowl but I'm really not sure one way or the other. I lean towards him not winning one though because in elimination/ playoff games he shrinks. If i saw him play better in those games or even play at his normal regular season level I may feel differently. 2012 versus Waahington really stands out in my mind. It was very winnable and Romo really played horrifically. I have given up on him and am looking forward to drafting a new QB.
They're not correct.If these teams/stats are correct, by your own definition, I don't think Romo pressed too much.
I don't know how you're calculating "on average" or how far you went back to calculate the average, but I found something fascinating.
Unless, I looked up the wrong year, I found that the teams that were ranked last in defense actually had better records than the Cowboys did (with the exception of the 2012 Pittsburgh Steelers).
Now, if I calculated these incorrectly, forgive me (facts from NFL.com). (And I suspect maybe I did because I couldn't believe what I was reading/seeing.) But I looked up defensive stats for the past eight years, then looked at #32, and the teams listed below, are the teams that were ranked last.
2012 - Pittsburgh (8-8)
2011 - Pittsburgh (12-4)
2010 - San Diego (9-7)
2009 - NY Jets (9-7)
2008 - Pittsburgh (12-4)
2007 - Tampa Bay (9-7)
2006 - Baltimore (13-3)
2005 - Tampa Bay (11-5)
If these teams/stats are correct, by your own definition, I don't think Romo pressed too much.
I don't know how you're calculating "on average" or how far you went back to calculate the average, but I found something fascinating.
Unless, I looked up the wrong year, I found that the teams that were ranked last in defense actually had better records than the Cowboys did (with the exception of the 2012 Pittsburgh Steelers).
Now, if I calculated these incorrectly, forgive me (facts from NFL.com). (And I suspect maybe I did because I couldn't believe what I was reading/seeing.) But I looked up defensive stats for the past eight years, then looked at #32, and the teams listed below, are the teams that were ranked last.
2012 - Pittsburgh (8-8)
2011 - Pittsburgh (12-4)
2010 - San Diego (9-7)
2009 - NY Jets (9-7)
2008 - Pittsburgh (12-4)
2007 - Tampa Bay (9-7)
2006 - Baltimore (13-3)
2005 - Tampa Bay (11-5)
If these teams/stats are correct, by your own definition, I don't think Romo pressed too much.