ufcrules1
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,652
- Reaction score
- 3,800
Why would you want to do that? When the Cowboys scored a lot in the first quarters this past season...
I'm interested in his career stats early in games. Not just last year.
Why would you want to do that? When the Cowboys scored a lot in the first quarters this past season...
1st qtr 78.7 (17th of 19 QB w/500+ att)I'm interested in his career stats early in games. Not just last year.
1st qtr 78.7 (17th of 19 QB w/500+ att)
rest of game 100.3 (4th of 25 QB w/1500+ att)
1st qtr 78.7 (17th of 19 QB w/500+ att)
rest of game 100.3 (4th of 25 QB w/1500+ att)
Thx Percy... Can you do this for 2nd and 3rd too? Would love too see some kind of graph.
Tony Romo is an above average QB, but he'll break your heart. And so many posters on here suffer from battered woman syndrome. Trying to justify why he isn't even close to part of the problem.
1st 78.7Thx Percy... Can you do this for 2nd and 3rd too? Would love too see some kind of graph.
Because that's where your heart is, with this team's pass offense. It's the only part of the team that offers a consistent payoff for the emotional investment required of the fan. In this portfolio, diversification is not an option.Tony Romo is an above average QB, but he'll break your heart.
1st 78.7
2nd 98.6
3rd 99.0
4th/OT 101.4
There is no doubt Tony deserves some of the blame for our lack of success. He is certainly not blameless. The biggest reason though is who we have running the team. The lack of success was here long before Tony.
Yes, but he is part of the team and touches the ball on every offensive play. He needs to step his game up in the elimination/playoffs. I think we can both agree on that.
Agreed -- I want Tony to carry the team to playoff wins as much as anybody and I also believe he has to be better but he has to at least be put in reasonable positions to do so. Putting up 40 on the Broncos and losing frames a narrative on him that is simply false. I hope we can agree on that.
48 and not a win...
Agreed -- I want Tony to carry the team to playoff wins as much as anybody and I also believe he has to be better but he has to at least be put in reasonable positions to do so. Putting up 40 on the Broncos and losing frames a narrative on him that is simply false. I hope we can agree on that.
If you know your quarterback has Brett Favre-like tendencies, you don't give him the authority of Brett Favre. How hard is that to understand?
Tony Romo needed a young Bill Parcells. He didn't need a Bill Walsh.
He needed someone to keep him under control. Instead, we gave him the offense, and he turned out to be a mini Brett Favre without the championship appearances or the Super Bowl ring.
1st 78.7
2nd 98.6
3rd 99.0
4th/OT 101.4
He's definitely on the risky side of average, but nothing approaching Eli for example.If you know your quarterback has Brett Favre-like tendencies, you don't give him the authority of Brett Favre. How hard is that to understand?
Tony Romo needed a young Bill Parcells. He didn't need a Bill Walsh.
He needed someone to keep him under control. Instead, we gave him the offense, and he turned out to be a mini Brett Favre without the championship appearances or the Super Bowl ring.
Just remember 0-67.No doubt. I think another year or 2 with Parcells would have made Romo a much better QB/ student of the game and his career...especially elimination/playoff games would have looked a whole lot better.
This past season Romo has more input in the gameplan, and his 1st qtr rating is 90.6.That's pretty amazing.
Could that era. The further we get away from the original game plan, the better? Lol