Bleu Star;2589874 said:Well, as long as you keep replying then I am making enough sense for your level of comprehension.
Make sure you find some Romo video too. Thanks.
reddyuta;2589886 said:it would be a mistake to release owens.we know what we have with him when we got him.we should worry about our o-line who have been very inconsistent all season.first step is to fire houck.
1fisher;2589877 said:can't stay away, can you?![]()
wileedog;2589913 said:This is the first pic in the Pittsburgh game
Multiple people who saw the play have said they thought Owens pulled up on this route
http://www.nfl.com/videos?videoId=09000d5d80d210cf
Looks to me that Owen is certainly not running full speed when he enters the picture, and Romo clearly thought he would be further outside.
stiletto;2589253 said:This year was YEAR TWO dude. It's not like Garrett has been here 10 years. It's not like he's had 5 years of failure in Dallas.
And you didn't answer my question. What did you think of Garrett in year 1 when we finished 3rd on offense? Was he horrible?? This year we finished 13th with horrid offensive line play and multiple injuries to key personnel (felix, kosier, romo for 3 games). I do agree that he didn't adjust to things he needed to but I am not going to throw him under the bus for one down sophomore season....
Bleu Star;2589916 said:Nah. I have to get in on the post count padding fun too.
Bleu Star;2589925 said:You honestly cannot be serious. TO was expecting the ball to be 5 yards further than it was thrown. You guys have got to do better than this. I'm sure the Babe can help you out.
Oh, & theebs, I was looking for video evidence. Thanks but no thanks on the audio. At least wileedog tried to provide some semblance of video evidence.
But Owens seems to be finding it increasingly difficult to conceal his irritation. Last week in Pittsburgh, on the first possession of the Cowboys' most important game of the season, a team source who reviewed the game tape said Romo threw an interception when Owens mysteriously failed to complete his route.
In the meantime, you're paying him another $6M+ for 2009, and there's no guarantee that 2010 will be uncapped. If there is a new CBA, you're adding cost to future caps by keeping him another year.bysbox1;2589915 said:Yep. Plus I don't think Jerry Jones is going to eat the 8.5 million dollars or so of cap money for a player that is no longer on the roster.
I think everyone has the wrong year. He stays this year, but will probably get "taken to the shed" by Jerry Jones. Next year he gets cut when the cap hit will be much less and the possibility of an uncapped year.
1fisher;2589935 said:who gives a rip about padding post.... is there a prize of something?
It's not like selling Grit newspaper....... geez!
McCordsville Cowboy;2589936 said:
wileedog;2589937 said:I can't make you believe it. But the media even reported it. Here's Mosely's take
http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/news/story?id=3763209
No where's your evidence?
Bleu Star;2589925 said:You honestly cannot be serious. TO was expecting the ball to be 5 yards further than it was thrown. You guys have got to do better than this. I'm sure the Babe can help you out.
Oh, & theebs, I was looking for video evidence. Thanks but no thanks on the audio. At least wileedog tried to provide some semblance of video evidence.
Beast_from_East;2589944 said:I did not read all 22 pages, but I will say that Jerry was very serious when he said that cutting TO would prevent them from signing Ware.
So unless Jerry has discovered an accounting error or something, I seriously doubt is going to cut TO.