Dale
Forum Architect
- Messages
- 7,785
- Reaction score
- 7,395
SkinsandTerps;1288708 said:Not yet, he has show me great in one series and then crap in the next. Kinda like Majkowski.
Alex Smith, but not Vince Young or Leinart ? To me the pro-bowl is another BS accolade. Like I stated Romo has done a pretty good job overall. I just dont think he is the greatest thing since sliced bread at this point.
You obviously havent read the entire thread. I have given praise and criticism to both guys. But at this point I dont think one is a clear cut better player.
Here it is. They both have the potential to be very good. It will depend on their individual development though.
A
I agree.
It varies from passer to passer, game to game, system to system.
Although I think Carr has the potential to still be a good QB, his OL doesnt help him at all, not to mention his RB situation.
On the Alex Smith thing, I was just tossing out a young guy's name that hasn't really done much. Many, many more players could have been listed -- like a Leinart or Young.
I guess I'm just used to the word potential being used here for guys like Bobby Carpenter, Kevin Burnett, Miles Austin -- or, in years past, Ebenezer Ekuban, Dwayne Goodrich, etc. In other words, players that hadn't done anything but had decent measurables and/or were drafted high. Heck, to go back even further, it used to be used for guys like Jason Tucker, Chris Brazzell, and every other 6-2, fast receiver that (seemingly) never caught a ball.
I agree Romo's not the greatest thing since sliced bread. And my previous post was solely about Romo and not about the Romo/Campbell comparison. I guess I just have a hard time looking at him as "just" a potential guy.
To me, he's already a good quarterback in this league. How good? Well, one season doesn't prove that. He might be marginal, great or off and on. Consistency and sustained stamina will determine that. But one can easily go down a list of passers and find, off the top of your head, and list about 18 guys that have easily performed worse this season.
Not to drag this thing out any further, but Henson was all potential. Potential, to me, is that dreaded four-letter word used for players that haven't done anything. While Romo hasn't proven he's a star or a great player, I think he's advanced past the "potential" stage. Why? Because he's already done something -- several things, in fact. Potential guys, typically, haven't really done anything at all.
If not, what label would you use to differentiate Romo from a Leinart or Alex Smith. They're all on different levels of proven success right now. I don't think one label applies to each of them equally. That's my beef with the potential thing.