Can La'el Collins play RT?

I've already quoted Brugler pointing out his initial quickness in pass pro. That would be a dropstep. None of those things you named are mutually exclusive with poor technique in fact they are related.

For someone claiming to have a PhD in philosophy from Duke you lack even the barest ability to make a deduction.

Again you have no idea why the Cowboys chose to do what they did. You sure like to wishcast. Claiming that my arguing that is conjecture is rich in vitamin I. You have nothing but baseless conjecture to support your claim of the Cowboys rationale. You basically insert what you think like a megalomaniac.

Brugler said that he was the best speed rusher. As I pointed out to you there is more than just speed rushing. There are also speed to power and power moves. If you or Brugler thought that he was better than Bosa at those then you were and still remain wrong. That bears out in Bosa missing all of camp and playing a third less of the season and still doubling Spence's sack total.

You are right that I have a ton of respect for Bosa. He is the talented and pro ready 4-3 DE to come out in the past 20 years.

We are done, I disagree with you, no more wasting time and no more personal attacks from you!
bf851cd38b04ef0cb997763e6ca7d72bd2f8f9e84552925e3ef86a457ee9d964.jpg
 
We are done, I disagree with you, no more wasting time.

You said this 24 hours ago. If you want to tuck tail and run then have at it.

Trying to deduct without checking exclusivity makes me think you lie about your credentials. It's so incredibly basic.
 
You said this 24 hours ago. If you want to tuck tail and run then have at it.

Trying to deduct without checking exclusivity makes me think you lie about your credentials. It's so incredibly basic.

More personal attacks, that is all you do, speaks volumes and will be reported if you fail to stop.

71df585ce3210df617473ad70298f617.jpg
 
More personal attacks, that is all you do, speaks volumes and will be reported if you fail to stop.

71df585ce3210df617473ad70298f617.jpg

Go ahead and then they will read your attacks on me like calling me mentally ill. Nice victim card though. Typical from the guy frustrated from losing the argument.

You also said you were done. That didn't take long.
 
Go ahead and then they will read your attacks on me like calling me mentally ill. Nice victim card though. Typical from the guy frustrated from losing the argument.

You also said you were done. That didn't take long.

I never called you anything, we disagree, move on and stop insulting everyone you disagree with constantly.

You have no argument.
 
I never called you anything, we disagree, move on and stop insulting everyone you disagree with constantly.

You have no argument.

If you are in denial about this you have literally buried your head in the sand.

Honestly, I am thinking this is a psychological issue at this point, we will have to agree to disagree.

Uh huh. Of course you didn't say I was mentally ill, you said I had a psychological issue. :rolleyes:

And its funny I made several arguments like the one about the strengths portion of Bruglers write up, or how your deduction failed to demonstrate exclusivity, and about how Bosa has been shown to be the better pass rusher than Spence yet here you are claiming I have no argument.

Its especially rich in vitamin I considering you have resorted to memes mostly for the past several posts. And I thought you said you were done. I would advise to let the male ego go. Can you do that?
 
Uh huh. Of course you didn't. :rolleyes:

And its funny I made several arguments like the one about the strengths portion of Bruglers write up, or how your deduction failed to demonstrate exclusivity, and about how Bosa has been shown to be the better pass rusher than Spence yet here you are claiming I have no argument.

Its especially rich in vitamin I considering you have resorted to memes mostly for the past several posts. And I thought you said you were done. I would advise to let the male ego go. Can you do that?

We are done, the psychological comment is about denial strategy of written materials, context clues, burying your head in the sand.

We are done, memes are to point out you are attacking me personally, stop.

We disagree, time to move along.
 
We are done, the psychological comment is about denial strategy of written materials.

We are done, memes are to point out you are attacking me personally, stop.

We disagree, time to move along.

You said that the only reason you could figure I couldn't agree with you was because I had psychological issues. How you claim to have come to the conclusion and the conclusion itself are hardly mutually exclusive; quite the contrary. You have once again failed to deduct, Dr. from Duke.

I do understand why you would try to back away from that tripe though.

If you want to move along then do so. I'm content to argue.
 
You said that the only reason you could figure I couldn't agree with you was because I had psychological issues. Again the two notions are not mutually exclusive. You have once again failed to deduct, Dr. from Duke. I do understand why you would try to back away from that tripe though.

If you want to move along then do so. I'm content to argue.

Incorrect, context clues, burying your head in the sand, denial of written materials you disagree with accordingly.

Your interpretation is wrong, I explained it in context.

Time to move on now, we disagree and that is not going to change.
 
Incorrect, context clues, burying your head in the sand, denial of written materials you disagree with accordingly.

Your interpretation is wrong, I explained it in context.

Time to move on now.

No you didn't. You are listing the things you named as cause in the hope that can deduct your claim that I have a psychological issue. It's called dissembling hard.

You concluded from your characterizations like 'head in the sand' and 'arguing from ignorance' that I had a psychological issue. It is what it is.

You have yet to even address the mutual exclusivity argument. Makes me doubt you understand it's significance to a deduction.

Again if you want to move on then do so but you seem more than content trying to martyr yourself.
 
No you didn't. You are listing the things you named as cause in the hope that can deduct your claim that I have a psychological issue. It's called dissembling hard.

You concluded from your characterizations like 'head in the sand' and 'arguing from ignorance' that I had a psychological issue. It is what it is.

You have yet to even address the mutual exclusivity argument. Makes me doubt you understand it's significance to a deduction.

Again if you want to move on then do so but you seem more than content trying to martyr yourself.
4c74c3326da65af5d3fb4d6536548c68.jpg
 

I have always been amused by such dismissals. People that go out out of their way to act like they don't care are simply not believable.

As long as you are done trying to put yourself on a cross I'm satisfied. You cannot even defend your insult anymore.
 
I have always been amused by such dismissals. People that go out out of their way to act like they don't care are simply not believable.

As long as you are done trying to put yourself on a cross I'm satisfied. You cannot even defend your insult anymore.
4c74c3326da65af5d3fb4d6536548c68.jpg
 
It's not that simple.

Larry Allen made the Pro Bowl at OT but was better at Guard. If the Cowboys would have had to choose between Free and LA at OT back then, then LA would have stayed at OT.

This shows you fail to appreciate the positional differences.

At guard you are delivering a punch and doing so in a closed space. At tackle you've got to range...protect the castle.

Allen might have been fine at tackle but was HOF at guard.

Generally speaking:
Tackles are leaner. Guards meaner.
Tackles taller with with span. Guards wider with junk in trunk
Tackles need quickness. Guards power and leverage.
Tackles need more lateral quickness.

Allen was born to play guard.
 
This shows you fail to appreciate the positional differences.

At guard you are delivering a punch and doing so in a closed space. At tackle you've got to range...protect the castle.

Allen might have been fine at tackle but was HOF at guard.

Generally speaking:
Tackles are leaner. Guards meaner.
Tackles taller with with span. Guards wider with junk in trunk
Tackles need quickness. Guards power and leverage.
Tackles need more lateral quickness.

Allen was born to play guard.

Allen was All Pro at LT. He was born to play OL.
 
Fuzzy you've been a bit of a wreck in this thread. After scanning your posts hereI too am done discussing things with you.

If you want to claim that as some victory go right ahead. It's what a sophist would do...playing games rather than seeking the truth.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
464,089
Messages
13,788,194
Members
23,772
Latest member
BAC2662
Back
Top