phillycard
Active Member
- Messages
- 755
- Reaction score
- 191
Coakleys Dad;1399927 said:thats so funny, they traded him because he couldnt cover, now the'll pay him more to come back and not being able to cover.
Coakleys Dad;1399927 said:thats so funny, they traded him because he couldnt cover, now the'll pay him more to come back and not being able to cover.
Good point. It could have been much much worse for you guys. I do feel a bit of pity for Commanders fans because of their braindead front office.apickmans;1400250 said:I'm just happy we didnt try to outbid the 49ers for Clements, or trade away picks/players for Bly. I'm happy we got Smoot back but its not like I think our defense will be Top 10 again with him there.
theogt;1400257 said:Good point. It could have been much much worse for you guys. I do feel a bit of pity for Commanders fans because of their braindead front office.
I'd bet good money you guys trade down. I don't think you'll get much out of a trade, though, unless Quinn is still there. Other than that there aren't many must have players at the top.apickmans;1400279 said:Maybe, just maybe the FO is learning. We'll see though. If we trade down and acquire more draft picks you will see me dancing in the streets, unless C. Johnson falls to us. HA
Hostile;1399933 said:Toast is back?
Oh life is good.
WoodysGirl;1400300 said:POSTED 4:36 p.m. EST, March 2, 2007
SMOOT BACK TO 'SKINS?
An entry from a supposedly respected poster on a message board owned by the Washington Commanders indicates that cornerback Fred Smoot has signed with the team, after a two-year detour to Minnesota.
The story has been up for a couple of hours, but we have found no official confirmation of it.
Because of that, we weren't going to post it yet. But we've gotten over 100 e-mails from 'Skins fans who swear that it's legit, so we figured the only way we would shut them up was to use it.
But it says alot when the only confirmation is a messageboard posting, even by a guy like Om.apickmans;1400306 said:Haha Om is famous.
Chocolate Lab;1400336 said:
How far have the Skins fallen when they rejoice getting One Rep back?
this is like a dream come trueMossBurner;1399963 said:Rogers will be a starter, no question. Couple
3. Springs leaves. Smoot and Rogers at CB.
4. Springs leaves. Smoot/other new CB starts opposite Rogers.
I have to agree with this. That contract given to Clements was insane!apickmans;1400250 said:I'm just happy we didnt try to outbid the 49ers for Clements, or trade away picks/players for Bly. I'm happy we got Smoot back but its not like I think our defense will be Top 10 again with him there.
MossBurner;1399915 said:You heard it here first.
carphalen5150;1400015 said:Not sure what the contract details are, but bringing him back is good for them. I could homer out and say that AB mad him his biznatch, but looking at it realistically they are a better team with him on it. The funny thing is that some of you guys would be jumping up and down if we had signed him.