Cbz40 Post Game Thread | Dallas Cowboys 10 Denver Broncos 17 FINAL

[skinsscalper]

What have you done for me lately.

Denver 17 Dallas 10

2-2 this season

Just as many INT's as TD's

I dont give a rats *** what your stats say he has done in the PAST

Word^^^

 

[Bach]

I am talking about an Offensive Coordinator that doesn't know his opponent. Why the hell would you throw it to the 4th string receiver on back to back plays at the end of the game.

The same reason he called two fade routes at the goal line last week, despite having a running game that put up over 200 yards on the ground.

Jason Garrett, Jerry's handpicked OC, is a total joke.

 

[bysbox1]

KC -W
Atl - W
Sea - W (5-2 the high point)
Philli - L
Greenbay - L
Wash - W
Oak - W
NY - L
SD - L
NO - L
Wash - W
Phil - L

looks like 8-8 to me...

I will say though, there is a slight chance that if we can somehow win these next three, the team may get confident enough to make a run...

We won't beat Atlanta.

And if this team goes into KC and lays an egg (which is possible because KC plays very well at home) then all bets are off.

But I say 7-9 and we miss the playoffs again . . .

 

[AdamJT13]

What have you done for me lately.

Denver 17 Dallas 10

2-2 this season

Just as many INT's as TD's

I dont give a rats *** what your stats say he has done in the PAST

That's nice, but that wasn't the question.

Just because he's been mediocre for four games doesn't mean we should lie about what he's done in the past.

 

[skinsscalper]

Before he was injured last year, he was 128-for-198 (64.6 percent) for 1,689 yards, 14 touchdowns, five interceptions and a 104.5 rating.

That's some kind of mediocre.

And every season so far, he has had a winning percentage of at least .600 and a rating of at least 91.4.

Super! And that's translated toooooo.........?

 

[Bach]

That's nice, but that wasn't the question.

Just because he's been mediocre for four games doesn't mean we should lie about what he's done in the past.

Thanks JT, your stats always make me feel much better and forget about how bad our team is.

 

[skinsscalper]

Thanks JT, your stats always make me feel much better and forget about how bad our team is.

I wish that was even remotely possible.

 

[windward]

Why can't we beat Atlanta at home?

Sometimes you guys go overboard.

 

[deepBLUE]

you know, that 'not winning a playoff game for 13 years' is starting to smart...

i expected about 8-8 this year...but i didn't expect an implosion by romo. i expected garrett's refusal to make adjustments; but i didn't expect to miss parcells so badly...

 

[Rampage]

Why can't we beat Atlanta at home?

Sometimes you guys go overboard.

oh look! it's Zrinkill 2.0

please tell us how we're all overreacting and how we're gonna win the Superbowl!

 

[peeblesri]

Romo and Garret??????? Wow Hurd is r go to guy!

 

[Ren]

Why can't we beat Atlanta at home?

Because we'll have our good game next week so in true cowboys style we go into that game full of our selves and tank, it never fails

 

[JonJon]

Wow look at all the knee jerk reactions on this board! you guys are crazy...this team is still 2-2 there's plenty of time left in the season. The sky is falling! The sky is falling! you guys suck as fans. you're not a real fan like me. You see, since we are 2-2, that means the glass is half-full, but some of you fake fans will see it as half-empty. The Negative Nancies are taking over. Instead of crying and whining, you need to be a blind homer like me. Tony Romo is a great QB...he's better than Aikman. He wins big games. Just look at those stats of his, all nice and shiny. And Garrett is a genius...I can't wait for him to take over as HC. Forget TO. We don't need that clown. We've got undrafted Miles Austin. Just wait until we unleash on the Chiefs. All you clowns will eat crow.


[/sarcasm]

 

[khiladi]

I thought we sucked because Romo was forcing the ball to TO last year and couldn't get it to guys that were obviously open...

 

[bysbox1]

Why can't we beat Atlanta at home?

Sometimes you guys go overboard.

Because that's exactly the kind of game that this team loses. After a bye week, at home, two weeks to prepare for your next opponent and make adjustments.

And Atlanta has a pretty good offense and their defense has been playing well.

We should beat Atlanta, but that has all the earmarkings of a trap game.

 

[panther1012]

We won't beat Atlanta.

And if this team goes into KC and lays an egg (which is possible because KC plays very well at home) then all bets are off.

But I say 7-9 and we miss the playoffs again . . .

What happens IF we finish 7-9 or 8-8? What do you think changes in Dallas?

 

[Ren]

I thought we sucked because Romo was forcing the ball to TO last year and couldn't get it to guys that were obviously open...

"Romo friendly"

 

[bysbox1]

I thought we sucked because Romo was forcing the ball to TO last year and couldn't get it to guys that were obviously open...

Some would like to believe that.

 

[CaptainAmerica]

Anyone who looks at this team objectively and thinks about the organization and the head coach and the staff clearly sees an 9-7, 8-8 team. win one week lose the next win one week, lose the next.

That's the story of Wade's career.

 

[windward]

oh look! it's Zrinkill 2.0

please tell us how we're all overreacting and how we're gonna win the Superbowl!

oh please as if you reek of credibility rampage.half the time you have no freaking clue what you are talking about. I criticize this team. The team played poorly but there's no reason we can't beat Atlanta at home.

No one including myself is talking super bowl right now.