-Om- said:
I'm just curious, Hos: what would you guys do if you didn't have a "smack" board to routinely sweep this kind of thread to? Looks like about a half dozen threads at the top of this forum right now that wouldn't play on our main board any more than they do yours.
I think you're missing my point, but I get yours.
I think this forum usually serves one purpose, it allows thug-like or troll-like threads to die while good football discussions, which is what most of us want, can go on. If a poster sees that his childishness is not getting the attention he/she craves quite often they go away without our having to be heavy handed.
You can criticize the existence of this forum, but I think it allows us an advantage. Simply put, that good football discussions can remain out front.
This forum has seen it's share of activity. A lot of our QB wars threads ended up here. I think some good has resulted from these back and forths with the Skins fans. Maybe you'll agree, maybe you won't. My level of respect for Monte51Coleman went up several notches because of the half dozen threads you speak of and the rationale he has brought here.
Fact is, we don't have a Smack board, and never will. So we deal with disruptive posts and posters---be they fans of other teams OR Skins fans---by either asking their creators to back off, making the posts go away, or, depending how they react to those efforts, making them go away.
Occasionally we have to do this too.
You could easily have a Smack Forum. I think it helps our board run cleaner with less Moderation needed. If you don't see the benefit that's cool.
Let me tell you another forum we have that the members here don't even see. It is called the "Deleted Zone." You know the threads that just disappear? Well, they don't just disappear here. They go to a separate forum where the Moderators have access so that if it comes time to ban someone the evidence is not lost forever.
I totally agree with you and Monte about the need to ban trolls. I don't care what team they root for, I don't like trolls. I've banned dozens of Cowboys trolls. There's no favoritism shown here.
My complaint stems from the Draconian measures when someone is not a troll. Did I troll your forum with my 4 posts? If so, please show me how.
I disagreed with Art and refused to budge from what I know to be right. Is that worthy of a ban? That is exactly what my options were/are.
I've brought up LTN's situation and I will again. Why was Chopper Dave not banned? What he said was far more offensive than bimbo. Or do you disagree with that?
But we've had over 120 new members sign up since Tuesday morning. Many of them---MANY of them---people openly identifying themselves as Cowboy fans and who I'm absolutely certain, could you see their user profiles and initial posts, you would recognize as classic trolls just as quickly as we do. So I'm seriously asking ... given that we don't institutionalize smack, or particularly wish to spend 24/7 trying to kindly approach and cajole and mold people who are clearly there to agitate and agitate alone ... what would you do?
Like I already said, I totally agree with you guys banning people who are trolls. On that point I agreed with Monte, and I agree with you. I don't know how I can make it any clearer. When they are obvious trolls ban them. They deserve it. I have no use for them. I don't care what colors they wave.
Where I disagree is in the dichotomy that arises from my treatment there versus how I treated "CowboysSuckAzz" when he arrived here.
Wide chasm there Om. I saw evidence of the same kind with regards to LTN and Chopper Dave.
That's all I am saying. I hope you understand the difference.