- Messages
- 62,405
- Reaction score
- 64,176
I dislike having to defend Shazam! but the movie is not slapstick comedy. I am the literal type so slapstick to me is like Three's Company, The Three Stooges, etc. It is not even an example of silliness like the Batman 60's series.i keep considering finally seeing Shazam,.. but i just cannot get the thought of slap-stick comedy and silliness that Shazam trailers seems to be suggesting it is ...
And i don't like,.. nor can i relate with my super heroes being 'comical- goofy'. It gives me vibes of Jar Jar Blink in Star Wars
And its' a different means of comedy spots, and 'small occasion' such as Thor: Ragnorak, .. but Love and Thunder really just went plum loco with making it substantially drowning with
over- indulging comedy.
This is where i'd be worry about Disney's way of Marvel production- whether movie film or series.
Not sure if you have seen the show or the movie but Shazam is patterned like Chuck (Zachary Levi's old show, which is probably why he was picked to play the superhero) or Big (Tom Hanks) as I mentioned earlier. It is a mixture of adult and childish sarcasm within a dramatic setting but both are not usually expressed at the same time in any given scene. AND IT IS DEFINITELY NOT LIKE JAR JAR BINKS!