nobody
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,944
- Reaction score
- 19,497
Brad Pitt's cameo was hilariousThat whole X-Force recruiting scene was hilarious! Can’t wait for the next one. Very few movies make me laugh lately as much as the Deadpool flicks.
Brad Pitt's cameo was hilariousThat whole X-Force recruiting scene was hilarious! Can’t wait for the next one. Very few movies make me laugh lately as much as the Deadpool flicks.
The nerds are going to watch everything Marvel related on Disney+, but there's a difference between that and something being "highly anticipated". Maybe it needs more qualifiers like "highly anticipated amongst many of the Nerd Kings"........ and they know who they are.To be frank, I think it would be necessary in defining who those 'nerds and nerd kings' are (thanks @Runwildboys ). On one hand, there are those who have bought books, watched cartoons and been greatly entertained by these live action adaptations. On the other hand, there are those who have a real vested interest in the makeup and backgrounds of the characters themselves.
If all the nerds are counted together, I might agree with a 50/50 prediction. The nerds who:
--those folks will comprise the bulk of Disney+ subscribers who will watch every episode, even if total viewership will be lower than Disney expects.
- want to see how Marvel/Disney adapts a representation of an ionic energy being (pretty unique in nature especially considering he is not a mutant)
- has the duality of villain AND hero, who has walked a sordid fairly rich past on both sides of 'good and evil'
I’ll wager that you’ll be watching.The nerds are going to watch everything Marvel related on Disney+, but there's a difference between that and something being "highly anticipated". Maybe it needs more qualifiers like "highly anticipated amongst many of the Nerd Kings"........ and they know who they are.
Of course.I’ll wager that you’ll be watching.
That’s great news! I’ve been a fan for a long time and it’s great to hear they’re finally moving forward on a sequel. Now we just hope it’s good!Justin Theroux Joins Michael Keaton In ‘Beetlejuice’ Sequel At Warner Bros
By Justin Kroll | Deadline
May 9, 2023
EXCLUSIVE: Justin Theroux is latest new addition to the ensemble of Warner Bros’ Beetlejuice sequel that has Tim Burton directing and Michael Keaton set to reprise his iconic character. Winona Ryder is also set to reprise her role from the original 1988 supernatural comedy, with Jenna Ortega set to play Ryder’s daughter in the new pic.
Not much is known about the sequel except that the titular ghost will return to cause more antics. Details about who Theroux is playing are also under wraps. Warner Bros just dated the pic for September 6, 2024, with production set to start Wednesday in the UK.
Burton is also producing along with Tommy Harper, Plan B, Marc Toberoff and David Geffen, with Alfred Gough and Miles Millar penning the most recent draft.
Read more
One thing about the original is the terrible special effects. That should be a huge improvement this time around, but I hope it doesn't end up being the main focus.Justin Theroux Joins Michael Keaton In ‘Beetlejuice’ Sequel At Warner Bros
By Justin Kroll | Deadline
May 9, 2023
EXCLUSIVE: Justin Theroux is latest new addition to the ensemble of Warner Bros’ Beetlejuice sequel that has Tim Burton directing and Michael Keaton set to reprise his iconic character. Winona Ryder is also set to reprise her role from the original 1988 supernatural comedy, with Jenna Ortega set to play Ryder’s daughter in the new pic.
Not much is known about the sequel except that the titular ghost will return to cause more antics. Details about who Theroux is playing are also under wraps. Warner Bros just dated the pic for September 6, 2024, with production set to start Wednesday in the UK.
Burton is also producing along with Tommy Harper, Plan B, Marc Toberoff and David Geffen, with Alfred Gough and Miles Millar penning the most recent draft.
Read more
There are usually lulls like those in most all-cast members type settings. Most get-together videos are edited to just the good banter segments. I do agree that the editing was bad within that lull though.That was an awful interview. There was very little agreement on anything at all. I also didn't like the cutaways. Watch a TNG interview and you'll see pretty much everyone remembering and laughing about each anecdote...and I don't think you'll see anyone making fun of someone who didn't make the cast.
The writer's strike is what killed Heroes. They didn't keep the season 1 writers either I don't think.... those two things led to its fall'Heroes' Was the Right TV Show at the Wrong Time
By Jack Coleman | Collider
May 12, 2023
It’s 2006. The modern superhero scene is still in its infancy, and it’ll be two years before Iron Man and The Dark Knight release and signal the change of the genre into a global phenomenon. The last two Marvel movies were the middlingly received Fantastic Four and the widely hated X-Men: The Last Stand. Into this ecosystem, a new superhero show comes out from NBC, aptly named, Heroes. The show is not only good, it’s exceptional, so good that it might join the ranks of Lost in the early days of the “golden age of prestige TV”.
Flash forward to the present day, superhero media has become the dominant cultural juggernaut; while Marvel had once been lucky to get one movie a year, in 2022 they managed three – and that’s not even counting the numerous shows and specials. Heroes, however, is not remembered fondly, the show synonymous with high hopes and low returns, of an excellent series brought so low that fans were almost glad when it was eventually canceled. This fate begs two main questions: what happened to such a promising show to bring it so low? And more intriguingly, could that fate have been avoided had it been released in the modern superhero landscape?
Read more