bbgun
Benched
- Messages
- 27,869
- Reaction score
- 6
theogt;2156716 said:Says the guy who's never been able to show any WRs since 2000 that have had a more productive first 4 years to his career than Roy Williams.
Don Draper toasts this post.
theogt;2156716 said:Says the guy who's never been able to show any WRs since 2000 that have had a more productive first 4 years to his career than Roy Williams.
the DoNkEy PuNcH;2156599 said:Ellis isn't exactly a sack machine. Plus, when you have D-Ware on the other side, teams will always put max protection where he is. Ellis benefited from having a player of Ware's caliber on the other side of the line.
FuzzyLumpkins;2156710 said:Blah blah blah. Back it up or shut up chump.
theogt;2156716 said:Says the guy who's never been able to show any WRs since 2000 that have had a more productive first 4 years to his career than Roy Williams.
I get the point, but honestly I couldn't care less why Greg is productive, as long as he's productive. I'd hate to not have the guy, but value is where it's at, and having Roy Williams for 10 years is much more valuable than having Greg for 2-4 years.Alexander;2156744 said:Of course it is not a coincidence that he suddenly becomes "elite" with a truly elite player playing across from him.
Put Greg Ellis on a regular four man line with a player like DeWayne White on the other side, he would be embarassingly pathetic.
cowboys2233;2156740 said:No, just trying to keep things in perspective. Let's enjoy what we have, rather than worry about what we don't. We had Michael Irvin in the 90s, along with a bunch of other guys at the WR position. And one KICK *** defense and running game.
This team is starting to look strangely similar to those teams. But having Boldin would excite me very much!!
Back to the original point. Roy Williams ain't all that, Boldin is greatness and I don't care what the stats say. I look into their eyes and see the difference!
FuzzyLumpkins;2156708 said:Again show me a list that says that. And Im not talking about some random FF garbage either.
Alexander;2156744 said:Of course it is not a coincidence that he suddenly becomes "elite" with a truly elite player playing across from him.
Put Greg Ellis on a regular four man line with a player like DeWayne White on the other side, he would be embarassingly pathetic.
theogt;2156761 said:I get the point, but honestly I couldn't care less why Greg is productive, as long as he's productive. I'd hate to not have the guy, but value is where it's at, and having Roy Williams for 10 years is much more valuable than having Greg for 2-4 years.
joseephuss;2156781 said:Ellis has never been embarrassingly pathetic, but you are darn right that he becomes more productive with a player of the caliber of Ware playing on the other side.
Alexander;2156734 said:I don't know of any imbecile who would turn down a Greg Ellis for Roy Williams trade.
That is so idiotic, I think you could give Matt Millen a frontal lobotomy and he would still laugh at the idea.
Alexander;2156784 said:It really is irrelevant what his value is to us. When you trade a player, his value has to be self-evident and have at least some relation to the team he might be traded to.
I don't care how valuable pass rushers are, Greg Ellis will never be traded for a younger player on the rise like Roy Williams.
It is insulting to even read something that idiotic.
Alexander;2156784 said:It really is irrelevant what his value is to us. When you trade a player, his value has to be self-evident and have at least some relation to the team he might be traded to.
I don't care how valuable pass rushers are, Greg Ellis will never be traded for a younger player on the rise like Roy Williams.
It is insulting to even read something that idiotic.
ABQCOWBOY;2156766 said:And when Irvin went down, that team went down for the count. I agree. It is interesting how simular these two teams are developing.
2233, are you certain that your looking into the respective players eyes (not sure how that's being done but no matter) or are you looking at Williams and seeing a LongHorn? In the end, aquiring Boldin next year or any top WR is risky at best. There is no guarantee that will happen. If the possability of aquiring Williams or Boldin or any top rated WR were available for the price of Henry and Ellis, I would take it.
joseephuss;2156790 said:I doubt it, too. Then again I think about Matt Millen and some of the moves he has made and that after this year Roy will be a free agent. Nope, still doesn't seem too likely.
theogt;2156716 said:Says the guy who's never been able to show any WRs since 2000 that have had a more productive first 4 years to his career than Roy Williams.
stasheroo;2156774 said:What would placate you?
PFW's list has him at #17 (slightly below the #15 I mentioned).
But I'm sure that list is baseless too.
cowboys2233;2156791 said:Not sure, but he's got the stink of a Longhorn who got worked by the Sooners and a Detroit Lion who got worked by everyone. Oh, and he doesn't tip pizza delivery guys.
In all seriousness, I don't like his playing style. As as I said many moons ago, he's got that oafish, lumbering stride like a Matt Jones. If we rely on this guy eventually becoming our #1, I think we're doomed. Doomed, I tell you.
ABQCOWBOY;2156832 said:There is nothing that I can see to support that position. However, you are certainly entitled you your opinion, bias as it may be.
Ellis and Henry for any top rated receiver in the NFL with no legal, charachter or substance issues in the NFL is a no brainer IMO.